A display-only Artificial Analysis factual knowledge index.
BenchLM mirrors the published score view for AA-Omniscience Index. Gemini 3.1 Pro leads the public snapshot at 32.9% , followed by Claude Opus 4.8 (27.4%) and Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) (26.2%). BenchLM does not use these results to rank models overall.
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
Anthropic
The published AA-Omniscience Index snapshot is tightly clustered at the top: Gemini 3.1 Pro sits at 32.9%, while the third row is only 6.7 points behind. The broader top-10 spread is 19.4 points, so the benchmark still separates strong models even when the leaders cluster.
115 models have been evaluated on AA-Omniscience Index. The benchmark falls in the Knowledge category. This category carries a 12% weight in BenchLM.ai's overall scoring system. AA-Omniscience Index is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.
Year
2026
Tasks
Knowledge questions
Format
Index score
Difficulty
Broad factual knowledge
BenchLM stores the AA-Omniscience index as a display-only factuality signal alongside the accuracy and hallucination-rate rows.
Version
AA-Omniscience Index 2026
Refresh cadence
Quarterly
Staleness state
Current
Question availability
Public benchmark set
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
A display-only Artificial Analysis factual knowledge index.
Gemini 3.1 Pro by Google currently leads with a score of 32.9% on AA-Omniscience Index.
115 AI models have been evaluated on AA-Omniscience Index on BenchLM.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.