Model profile
Grok 4.5
Evidence coverage
28 of 323 tracked benchmarks are published. 6 are verified and 22 provisional. 5 of 8 categories are measured.
- Published / tracked
- 28 / 323
- Verified
- 6
- Provisional
- 22
- Categories with evidence
- 5 / 8
Evidence by category
- Agentic11 benchmarksMixed evidence
- Coding7 benchmarksMixed evidence
- Reasoning2 benchmarksReported
- Knowledge6 benchmarksReported
- Math0 benchmarksNot measured
- Multilingual0 benchmarksNot measured
- Multimodal2 benchmarksReported
- Inst. Following0 benchmarksNot measured
Grok 4.5 ranks #7 out of 200 models on the public leaderboard with an overall score of 76.72/100. It also ranks #7 out of 99 on the verified leaderboard. This places it in the upper tier of AI models, with competitive scores across most benchmark categories.
Grok 4.5 is a proprietary model with a 500K token context window. It uses explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, which typically improves performance on math and complex reasoning tasks at the cost of higher latency and token usage.
BenchLM links it directly to Grok 4.3 as the earlier related model in that lineage. This profile currently has 28 of 323 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.
Its strongest category is Agentic (#12), while its weakest is Knowledge (#27). This performance profile makes it particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
Peer position
Exact provisional scores and ranks for the closest listed peers. A score can appear before a model clears the evidence threshold for a rank, so equal scores can have different rank states.
Range 72.57–78.34
- Claude Opus 4.8AnthropicCompare#578.34Claude Opus 4.8 is #5 with a score of 78.34.
- Muse Spark 1.1MetaCompare#677.44Muse Spark 1.1 is #6 with a score of 77.44.
- Grok 4.5Current modelxAI#776.72Grok 4.5 is #7 with a score of 76.72.
- GPT-5.4OpenAICompare#874.24GPT-5.4 is #8 with a score of 74.24.
- GPT-5.5OpenAICompare#973.51GPT-5.5 is #9 with a score of 73.51.
- Qwen3.7 MaxAlibabaCompare#1072.84Qwen3.7 Max is #10 with a score of 72.84.
- GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAICompare#1172.57GPT-5.6 Terra is #11 with a score of 72.57.
Category percentile
More
Relative position among models eligible for each sourced category. A higher percentile means a stronger position within that category's ranked cohort; 100 is highest.
- Agentic91%Eligible cohort rank #12 of 119Category score 60.0
- Multimodal57%Eligible cohort rank #13 of 29Category score 69.1
- Coding80%Eligible cohort rank #25 of 122Category score 59.1
- Knowledge49%Eligible cohort rank #27 of 52Category score 71.4
Category evidence
Scores and ranks appear only where this model has published benchmark evidence. Categories without displayable source records remain not measured.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #12 of 119Percentile 91stWeight 22%11 benchmarksMixed sources | 60.0 | #12 of 119 | 91st | 22% | 11 benchmarks | Mixed sources |
| CodingRank #25 of 122Percentile 80thWeight 20%7 benchmarksMixed sources | 59.1 | #25 of 122 | 80th | 20% | 7 benchmarks | Mixed sources |
| ReasoningWeight 17%2 benchmarksReported | Score pending | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 2 benchmarks | Reported |
| KnowledgeRank #27 of 52Percentile 49thWeight 12%6 benchmarksReported | 71.4 | #27 of 52 | 49th | 12% | 6 benchmarks | Reported |
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalRank #13 of 29Percentile 57thWeight 12%2 benchmarksReported | 69.1 | #13 of 29 | 57th | 12% | 2 benchmarks | Reported |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Chatbot Arena performance
Scroll horizontally to inspect confidence intervals and vote counts.
| View | Elo | Confidence interval | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text Overall | 1466 | ±7.6 | 6,942 |
| Coding | 1520 | ±13.6 | 2,076 |
| Math | 1504 | ±34.0 | 287 |
| Instruction Following | 1460 | ±12.7 | 2,349 |
| Creative Writing | 1438 | ±17.8 | 1,206 |
| Multi-turn | 1467 | ±17.9 | 1,166 |
| Hard Prompts | 1486 | ±9.3 | 4,578 |
| Hard Prompts (English) | 1487 | ±14.2 | 1,851 |
| Longer Query | 1482 | ±11.2 | 3,138 |
Benchmark Details
Rows below have a displayable published verification record. Each source link and provenance note remains in the page HTML while its category is closed. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows stay hidden.
Agentic11 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis Agentic Index
GDPval-AA normalized
Artificial Analysis Briefcase
Artificial Analysis AutomationBench
Artificial Analysis EnterpriseOps-Gym
Artificial Analysis Harvey LAB-AA
Artificial Analysis Tau3-Banking
Coding7 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis Coding Index
Artificial Analysis SciCode
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning
Critical Physics Tasks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond
Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro
Design Arena Website Elo
Frequently Asked Questions
How does Grok 4.5 perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Grok 4.5 has 28 published benchmark scores on BenchLM, but it does not yet have enough non-generated coverage to receive a global overall rank.
Is Grok 4.5 good for knowledge and understanding?
Grok 4.5 ranks #27 out of 52 models in knowledge and understanding benchmarks with an average score of 71.4. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Grok 4.5 good for coding and programming?
Grok 4.5 ranks #25 out of 122 models in coding and programming benchmarks with an average score of 59.1. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Grok 4.5 good for reasoning and logic?
Grok 4.5 has visible benchmark coverage in reasoning and logic, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is Grok 4.5 good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
Grok 4.5 ranks #12 out of 119 models in agentic tool use and computer tasks benchmarks with an average score of 60. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Grok 4.5 good for multimodal and grounded tasks?
Grok 4.5 ranks #13 out of 29 models in multimodal and grounded tasks benchmarks with an average score of 69.1. There are stronger options in this category.
Does Grok 4.5 have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
Not yet. Grok 4.5 currently has 28 published benchmark scores out of the 323 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.
What is the context window size of Grok 4.5?
Grok 4.5 has a published context window of 500K, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.
Related Resources
Choose with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, new releases, pricing changes, and the evidence behind them.
Free. One email per week.