Skip to main content

Model profile

Gemma 4 E2B

GoogleCurrentReleased Apr 2, 2026
Data verified
Overall Score
41.82Public #162 of 200
Arena Elo
Not listed
Eligible category ranks
0of 8
Price (1M tokens)
$0 in / $0 out
API pricing
Speed
Not listed
Context
128K

Evidence coverage

14 of 323 tracked benchmarks are published. 0 are verified and 14 provisional. 6 of 8 categories are measured.

Updated July 23, 2026Methodology
Published / tracked
14 / 323
Verified
0
Provisional
14
Categories with evidence
6 / 8

Evidence by category

  • Agentic1 benchmark
    Reported
  • Coding1 benchmark
    Reported
  • Reasoning2 benchmarks
    Reported
  • Knowledge8 benchmarks
    Reported
  • Math0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Multilingual0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Multimodal1 benchmark
    Reported
  • Inst. Following1 benchmark
    Reported
Open WeightSelf-hostReasoning
Confidence:
Low
e2b

Gemma 4 E2B ranks #162 out of 200 models on the public leaderboard with an overall score of 41.82/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for BenchLM's verified leaderboard. While not a frontier model, it offers specific advantages depending on the use case.

Gemma 4 E2B is a open weight model with a 128K token context window. It uses explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, which typically improves performance on math and complex reasoning tasks at the cost of higher latency and token usage.

Gemma 4 E2B sits inside the Gemma 4 family alongside Gemma 4 31B, Gemma 4 26B A4B, Gemma 4 12B, Gemma 4 E4B. This profile currently has 14 of 323 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

Peer position

Exact provisional scores and ranks for the closest listed peers. A score can appear before a model clears the evidence threshold for a rank, so equal scores can have different rank states.

Range 41.1342.06

  1. GPT-4.1 nano
    OpenAI
    #16142.06
    GPT-4.1 nano is #161 with a score of 42.06.
    Compare
  2. Gemma 4 E2BCurrent model
    Google
    #16241.82
    Gemma 4 E2B is #162 with a score of 41.82.
  3. Mistral Large 2
    Mistral
    #16341.77
    Mistral Large 2 is #163 with a score of 41.77.
    Compare
  4. Gemma 3 27B
    Google
    #16441.57
    Gemma 3 27B is #164 with a score of 41.57.
    Compare
  5. GPT-4o
    OpenAI
    #16541.49
    GPT-4o is #165 with a score of 41.49.
    Compare
  6. LFM2.5-8B-A1B
    LiquidAI
    #16641.42
    LFM2.5-8B-A1B is #166 with a score of 41.42.
    Compare
  7. Claude 3 Opus
    Anthropic
    #16841.13
    Claude 3 Opus is #168 with a score of 41.13.
    Compare

Category percentile

More

Relative position among models eligible for each sourced category. A higher percentile means a stronger position within that category's ranked cohort; 100 is highest.

No eligible category percentile is available from the published evidence yet.

Category evidence

Scores and ranks appear only where this model has published benchmark evidence. Categories without displayable source records remain not measured.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticWeight 22%1 benchmarkReportedScore pending
CodingRank Not rankedWeight 20%1 benchmarkReported44.0
ReasoningRank Not rankedWeight 17%2 benchmarksReported19.1
KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%8 benchmarksReported56.9
MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultimodalRank Not rankedWeight 12%1 benchmarkReported44.2
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%1 benchmarkReportedScore pending

Benchmark Details

Rows below have a displayable published verification record. Each source link and provenance note remains in the page HTML while its category is closed. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows stay hidden.

Agentic1 benchmark
τ²-bench resultsReported

τ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation

20.8%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Coding1 benchmark
AA-SciCodeReported

Artificial Analysis SciCode

20.9%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Reasoning2 benchmarks
AA-LCRReported

Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning

15.0%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
CritPtReported

Critical Physics Tasks

0.0%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Knowledge8 benchmarks
MMLU-ProReported

Massive Multitask Language Understanding Professional

60%Weighted 30%
Source: Reported upstream sourceProvenance: Reported row carried from an upstream public source. Displayable on BenchLM, but not treated as verified unless explicitly marked otherwise.
GPQAReported

Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A

43.4%Weighted 7%
Source: Reported upstream sourceProvenance: Reported row carried from an upstream public source. Displayable on BenchLM, but not treated as verified unless explicitly marked otherwise.
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexReported
9.3%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-GPQA DiamondReported

Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond

37.5%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-HLEReported

Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam

4.8%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-Omniscience IndexReported

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index

-24.0%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-Omniscience AccuracyReported

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy

6.7%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateReported

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate

32.9%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Multimodal1 benchmark
AA-MMMU-ProReported

Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro

44.6%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Inst. Following1 benchmark
AA-IFBenchReported

Artificial Analysis IFBench

35.1%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Gemma 4 E2B perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Gemma 4 E2B has 14 published benchmark scores on BenchLM, but it does not yet have enough non-generated coverage to receive a global overall rank.

Is Gemma 4 E2B good for knowledge and understanding?

Gemma 4 E2B has visible benchmark coverage in knowledge and understanding, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Gemma 4 E2B good for coding and programming?

Gemma 4 E2B has visible benchmark coverage in coding and programming, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Gemma 4 E2B good for reasoning and logic?

Gemma 4 E2B has visible benchmark coverage in reasoning and logic, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Gemma 4 E2B good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?

Gemma 4 E2B has visible benchmark coverage in agentic tool use and computer tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Gemma 4 E2B good for multimodal and grounded tasks?

Gemma 4 E2B has visible benchmark coverage in multimodal and grounded tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Gemma 4 E2B good for instruction following?

Gemma 4 E2B has visible benchmark coverage in instruction following, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Gemma 4 E2B open source?

Yes, Gemma 4 E2B is an open weight model created by Google, meaning it can be downloaded and run locally or fine-tuned for specific use cases.

Which sibling models are related to Gemma 4 E2B?

Gemma 4 E2B belongs to the Gemma 4 family. Related variants on BenchLM include Gemma 4 31B, Gemma 4 26B A4B, Gemma 4 12B, Gemma 4 E4B.

Does Gemma 4 E2B have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

Not yet. Gemma 4 E2B currently has 14 published benchmark scores out of the 323 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

What is the context window size of Gemma 4 E2B?

Gemma 4 E2B has a published context window of 128K, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.

Last updated: July 23, 2026 · Runtime metrics stay blank until BenchLM has a sourced snapshot.

Choose with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, new releases, pricing changes, and the evidence behind them.

Free. One email per week.