Skip to main content

Model profile

GLM-5-Turbo

Z.AICurrentReleased Mar 1, 2026
Data verified
Overall Score
66.89Public #24 of 200Verified #21 of 99
Arena Elo
1456
Eligible category ranks
0of 8
Price (1M tokens)
$1.2 in / $4 out
API pricing
Speed
Not listed
Context
200K

Evidence coverage

13 of 323 tracked benchmarks are published. 1 is verified and 12 provisional. 6 of 8 categories are measured.

Updated July 23, 2026Methodology
Published / tracked
13 / 323
Verified
1
Provisional
12
Categories with evidence
6 / 8

Evidence by category

  • Agentic2 benchmarks
    Mixed evidence
  • Coding1 benchmark
    Reported
  • Reasoning2 benchmarks
    Reported
  • Knowledge6 benchmarks
    Reported
  • Math0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Multilingual0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Multimodal1 benchmark
    Reported
  • Inst. Following1 benchmark
    Reported
ProprietaryReasoning
Confidence:
Low
turbo

GLM-5-Turbo ranks #24 out of 200 models on the public leaderboard with an overall score of 66.89/100. It also ranks #21 out of 99 on the verified leaderboard. This places it in the mid-tier of AI models, with strengths in specific benchmark categories.

GLM-5-Turbo is a proprietary model with a 200K token context window. It uses explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, which typically improves performance on math and complex reasoning tasks at the cost of higher latency and token usage.

GLM-5-Turbo sits inside the GLM-5 family alongside GLM-5, GLM-5.2, GLM-5.1, GLM-5 (Reasoning), GLM-5V-Turbo. This profile currently has 13 of 323 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

Peer position

Exact provisional scores and ranks for the closest listed peers. A score can appear before a model clears the evidence threshold for a rank, so equal scores can have different rank states.

Range 66.2767.22

  1. Qwen3.7 Plus
    Alibaba
    #2167.22
    Qwen3.7 Plus is #21 with a score of 67.22.
    Compare
  2. GPT-5.6 Luna
    OpenAI
    #2267.17
    GPT-5.6 Luna is #22 with a score of 67.17.
    Compare
  3. GPT-5.2 Pro
    OpenAI
    #2367.01
    GPT-5.2 Pro is #23 with a score of 67.01.
    Compare
  4. GLM-5-TurboCurrent model
    Z.AI
    #2466.89
    GLM-5-Turbo is #24 with a score of 66.89.
  5. GPT-5.4 nano
    OpenAI
    #2566.79
    GPT-5.4 nano is #25 with a score of 66.79.
    Compare
  6. GPT-5.3 Codex
    OpenAI
    #2666.69
    GPT-5.3 Codex is #26 with a score of 66.69.
    Compare
  7. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
    Anthropic
    #2766.27
    Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is #27 with a score of 66.27.
    Compare

Category percentile

More

Relative position among models eligible for each sourced category. A higher percentile means a stronger position within that category's ranked cohort; 100 is highest.

No eligible category percentile is available from the published evidence yet.

Category evidence

Scores and ranks appear only where this model has published benchmark evidence. Categories without displayable source records remain not measured.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticWeight 22%2 benchmarksMixed sourcesScore pending
CodingWeight 20%1 benchmarkReportedScore pending
ReasoningWeight 17%2 benchmarksReportedScore pending
KnowledgeWeight 12%6 benchmarksReportedScore pending
MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultimodalWeight 12%1 benchmarkReportedScore pending
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%1 benchmarkReportedScore pending

Chatbot Arena performance

Scroll horizontally to inspect confidence intervals and vote counts.

Chatbot Arena Elo, confidence interval, and vote count by evaluation view
ViewEloConfidence intervalVotes
Text Overall1456±6.011,101
Coding1491±11.62,492
Math1455±21.0717
Instruction Following1445±10.43,132
Creative Writing1442±14.61,725
Multi-turn1457±13.91,747
Hard Prompts1476±7.66,159
Hard Prompts (English)1480±10.92,816
Longer Query1462±10.43,140

Benchmark Details

Rows below have a displayable published verification record. Each source link and provenance note remains in the page HTML while its category is closed. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows stay hidden.

Agentic2 benchmarks
Claw-EvalBenchmark exact
55.8%Display only
Source: Claw-Eval leaderboardProvenance: Claw-Eval reports this model as glm5_turbo in the official 2026-05-09 leaderboard snapshot. BenchLM stores the primary Pass^3 value on the local Claw-Eval display key.
τ²-bench resultsReported

τ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation

98.5%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Coding1 benchmark
AA-SciCodeReported

Artificial Analysis SciCode

43.6%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Reasoning2 benchmarks
AA-LCRReported

Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning

60.7%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
CritPtReported

Critical Physics Tasks

0.3%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Knowledge6 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexReported
38.1%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-GPQA DiamondReported

Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond

84.7%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-HLEReported

Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam

25.4%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-Omniscience IndexReported

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index

-15.1%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-Omniscience AccuracyReported

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy

29.0%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateReported

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate

62.2%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Multimodal1 benchmark
Design Arena WebsiteReported

Design Arena Website Elo

1301Display only
Source: OpenRouter model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only Design Arena Website Elo synced from OpenRouter model benchmark metadata. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Inst. Following1 benchmark
AA-IFBenchReported

Artificial Analysis IFBench

73.2%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does GLM-5-Turbo perform overall in AI benchmarks?

GLM-5-Turbo has 13 published benchmark scores on BenchLM, but it does not yet have enough non-generated coverage to receive a global overall rank.

Is GLM-5-Turbo good for knowledge and understanding?

GLM-5-Turbo has visible benchmark coverage in knowledge and understanding, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is GLM-5-Turbo good for coding and programming?

GLM-5-Turbo has visible benchmark coverage in coding and programming, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is GLM-5-Turbo good for reasoning and logic?

GLM-5-Turbo has visible benchmark coverage in reasoning and logic, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is GLM-5-Turbo good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?

GLM-5-Turbo has visible benchmark coverage in agentic tool use and computer tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is GLM-5-Turbo good for multimodal and grounded tasks?

GLM-5-Turbo has visible benchmark coverage in multimodal and grounded tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is GLM-5-Turbo good for instruction following?

GLM-5-Turbo has visible benchmark coverage in instruction following, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Which sibling models are related to GLM-5-Turbo?

GLM-5-Turbo belongs to the GLM-5 family. Related variants on BenchLM include GLM-5, GLM-5.2, GLM-5.1, GLM-5 (Reasoning), GLM-5V-Turbo.

Does GLM-5-Turbo have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

Not yet. GLM-5-Turbo currently has 13 published benchmark scores out of the 323 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

What is the context window size of GLM-5-Turbo?

GLM-5-Turbo has a published context window of 200K, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.

Last updated: July 23, 2026 · Runtime metrics stay blank until BenchLM has a sourced snapshot.

Choose with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, new releases, pricing changes, and the evidence behind them.

Free. One email per week.