Skip to main content

Benchmark Confidence & Contamination Flags

Not all benchmark scores are equally trustworthy. BenchLM now separates verified ranking from provisionalranking while still tracking the provenance of every stored score. The confidence indicator (1-4 dots) shows how much sourced benchmark coverage supports each model's score.

●●●●High

7+ categories, 20+ non-generated benchmarks

●●●○Good

5+ categories, 12+ non-generated benchmarks

●●○○Moderate

3+ categories, 8+ non-generated benchmarks

●○○○Low / Estimated

Limited sourced data, score is estimated

Confidence Distribution (Ranked Models)

8

High (4%)

20

Good (10%)

22

Moderate (11%)

150

Low / Estimated (75%)

How BenchLM Scores Work

Verified, provisional, and generated

Each benchmark value is tagged as manual (a hand-entered public row) or generated (inferred from related models). Generated rows are excluded from all public ranking logic. Manual rows are now split again into sourced rows for the verified leaderboard and source-unverified rows that can still appear in provisional mode.

Ranking Eligibility

A model must have at least 8 qualifying benchmarks across 2+ categories to rank in a lane. The provisional leaderboard uses rankable non-generated rows; the verified leaderboard uses sourced rows only. Models below the threshold are shown as tracked but unranked.

Category Eligibility

For category leaderboards, a model needs qualifying scores on at least half of the weighted benchmarks in that category. BenchLM computes this separately for provisional and verified ranking so sparse exact-source coverage cannot silently borrow strength from provisional rows.

Display-Only Benchmarks

Some benchmarks (MMLU, BBH, HumanEval, older AIME/HMMT variants) are shown for context but don't affect scoring. These are either saturated (top models all score 97%+) or have been superseded by harder versions.

200 models match these filters.

Model / evidenceConfidence / score
Qwen3.7 PlusAlibaba51 sourced · 51 rankable · 0 generated
●●●●High67.22provisional score
Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic43 sourced · 43 rankable · 0 generated
●●●●High64.22provisional score
Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI40 sourced · 40 rankable · 0 generated
●●●●High59.66provisional score
Qwen3.6 PlusAlibaba39 sourced · 39 rankable · 0 generated
●●●●High65.2provisional score
GLM-5Z.AI35 sourced · 35 rankable · 0 generated
●●●●High66.06provisional score
Qwen3.5 397BAlibaba35 sourced · 35 rankable · 0 generated
●●●●High57.01provisional score
Qwen3.7 MaxAlibaba33 sourced · 33 rankable · 0 generated
●●●●High72.84provisional score
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle23 sourced · 23 rankable · 0 generated
●●●●High64.75provisional score
Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba40 sourced · 40 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good51.47provisional score
Qwen3.6-27BAlibaba37 sourced · 37 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good53.82provisional score
Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic31 sourced · 31 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good68.59provisional score
GPT-5.4OpenAI31 sourced · 31 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good74.24provisional score
GPT-5.5OpenAI29 sourced · 29 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good73.51provisional score
Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI29 sourced · 29 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good56.79provisional score
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic28 sourced · 28 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good78.34provisional score
Muse SparkMeta23 sourced · 23 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good71.04provisional score
GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI22 sourced · 22 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good81.96provisional score
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI20 sourced · 20 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good72.57provisional score
GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI20 sourced · 20 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good67.17provisional score
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle19 sourced · 19 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good55.3provisional score
Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic19 sourced · 19 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good65.07provisional score
InklingThinking Machines Lab16 sourced · 16 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good67.54provisional score
GPT-5.2OpenAI14 sourced · 14 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good58.43provisional score
Qwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba13 sourced · 13 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good60.56provisional score
Qwen3.5-27BAlibaba13 sourced · 13 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good60.7provisional score
Qwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba13 sourced · 13 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good56.97provisional score
GPT-5.4 miniOpenAI12 sourced · 12 rankable · 0 generated
●●●○Good56.77provisional score
DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)DeepSeek22 sourced · 22 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate55.47provisional score
DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek20 sourced · 20 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate60.66provisional score
DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek20 sourced · 20 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate58.88provisional score
Muse Spark 1.1Meta19 sourced · 19 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate77.44provisional score
GLM-5.1Z.AI18 sourced · 18 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate67.74provisional score
MiniMax M3MiniMax16 sourced · 16 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate69.75provisional score
Grok 4.20xAI16 sourced · 16 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate54.68provisional score
Claude Mythos 5Anthropic15 sourced · 15 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate83.93provisional score
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic15 sourced · 15 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate65.32provisional score
GLM-5.2Z.AI15 sourced · 15 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate63.96provisional score
Claude Fable 5Anthropic11 sourced · 11 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate83.68provisional score
Gemini 3 ProGoogle11 sourced · 11 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate67.73provisional score
GPT-5.4 nanoOpenAI11 sourced · 11 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate66.79provisional score
GPT-5.4 ProOpenAI11 sourced · 11 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate60.89provisional score
Gemma 4 12BGoogle11 sourced · 11 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate47.29provisional score
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)Alibaba10 sourced · 10 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate59.72provisional score
GLM-4.7Z.AI9 sourced · 9 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate61.16provisional score
Claude Sonnet 4.5Anthropic9 sourced · 9 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate53.61provisional score
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Moonshot AI8 sourced · 8 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate59.35provisional score
MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi8 sourced · 8 rankable · 0 generated
●●○○Moderate58.62provisional score
Kimi K3Moonshot AI29 sourced · 7 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~80.96provisional score
MiniMax M2.7MiniMax17 sourced · 17 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~64.11provisional score
Step 3.7 FlashStepFun10 sourced · 10 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~50.87provisional score
GPT-5.3 CodexOpenAI7 sourced · 7 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~66.69provisional score
MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi7 sourced · 7 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~70.19provisional score
GPT-5.5 ProOpenAI6 sourced · 6 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~63.69provisional score
Grok 4.5xAI6 sourced · 6 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~76.72provisional score
Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic6 sourced · 6 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~71.94provisional score
DeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek6 sourced · 6 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~55.4provisional score
Grok 4.3xAI6 sourced · 6 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~65.1provisional score
LFM2.5-8B-A1BLiquidAI6 sourced · 6 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~41.42provisional score
Gemma 4 31BGoogle6 sourced · 6 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~61.08provisional score
GPT-4.1OpenAI6 sourced · 6 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~51.11provisional score
Gemini 3 FlashGoogle5 sourced · 5 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~60.49provisional score
o3-miniOpenAI5 sourced · 5 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~47.41provisional score
GPT-4.1 miniOpenAI5 sourced · 5 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~44.19provisional score
Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle5 sourced · 5 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~57.25provisional score
o1OpenAI4 sourced · 4 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~48.1provisional score
Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic4 sourced · 4 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~56.58provisional score
Qwen3 235B 2507Alibaba4 sourced · 4 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~56.02provisional score
Qwen3.5 PlusAlibaba4 sourced · 4 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~47.2provisional score
Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle4 sourced · 4 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~57.96provisional score
GPT-4.1 nanoOpenAI4 sourced · 4 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~42.06provisional score
Trinity-Large-PreviewArcee AI4 sourced · 4 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~55.94provisional score
Trinity-Large-ThinkingArcee AI4 sourced · 4 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~52.32provisional score
GPT-5.1OpenAI3 sourced · 3 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~53.65provisional score
Grok 4xAI3 sourced · 3 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~60.42provisional score
GLM-4.6Z.AI3 sourced · 3 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~55.12provisional score
Ling 2.6 FlashInclusionAI3 sourced · 3 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~43.87provisional score
Command A+Cohere3 sourced · 3 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~47.51provisional score
Exaone 4.0 32BLG AI Research2 sourced · 2 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~40.44provisional score
Claude 4.1 OpusAnthropic2 sourced · 2 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~45.88provisional score
Claude 4 SonnetAnthropic2 sourced · 2 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~42.79provisional score
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGoogle2 sourced · 2 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~50.83provisional score
o4-mini (high)OpenAI2 sourced · 2 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~49.98provisional score
Kimi K2Moonshot AI2 sourced · 2 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~27.19provisional score
o3OpenAI2 sourced · 2 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~47.89provisional score
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle2 sourced · 2 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~48.09provisional score
Qwen3.5 FlashAlibaba2 sourced · 2 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~47.65provisional score
Grok 3 [Beta]xAI2 sourced · 2 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~40.43provisional score
Claude 3.5 SonnetAnthropic2 sourced · 2 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~47.74provisional score
GPT-5 (high)OpenAI2 sourced · 2 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~58.61provisional score
GPT-5.2-CodexOpenAI2 sourced · 2 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~59.1provisional score
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI2 sourced · 2 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~55provisional score
GPT-5.1-CodexOpenAI2 sourced · 2 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~52.72provisional score
MiMo-V2-FlashXiaomi1 sourced · 1 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~54.06provisional score
Gemini 3 Pro Deep ThinkGoogle1 sourced · 1 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~61.31provisional score
DeepSeek V3DeepSeek1 sourced · 1 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~44.97provisional score
GPT-4oOpenAI1 sourced · 1 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~41.49provisional score
Llama 4 ScoutMeta1 sourced · 1 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~39.87provisional score
Llama 4 MaverickMeta1 sourced · 1 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~23.49provisional score
GLM-5 (Reasoning)Z.AI1 sourced · 1 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~59.77provisional score
GLM-5-TurboZ.AI1 sourced · 1 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~66.89provisional score
MiMo-V2-ProXiaomi1 sourced · 1 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~67.78provisional score
GLM-5V-TurboZ.AI1 sourced · 1 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~63.5provisional score
MiMo-V2-OmniXiaomi1 sourced · 1 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~63.15provisional score
DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking)DeepSeek1 sourced · 1 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~58.15provisional score
MiniMax M2.5MiniMax1 sourced · 1 rankable · 48 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~59.52provisional score
GPT-OSS 120BOpenAI1 sourced · 1 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~50.08provisional score
GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxOpenAI1 sourced · 1 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~54.48provisional score
GPT-OSS 20BOpenAI1 sourced · 1 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~42.74provisional score
Nemotron 3 Super 100BNVIDIA1 sourced · 1 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~50.08provisional score
GPT-5 miniOpenAI1 sourced · 1 rankable · 60 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~43.93provisional score
Qwen3 MaxAlibaba1 sourced · 1 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~48.16provisional score
Claude Opus 4.5 ThinkingAnthropic1 sourced · 1 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~57.44provisional score
Grok 4.1xAI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~59.97provisional score
GPT-5.2 InstantOpenAI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 32 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~59provisional score
GPT-5.2 ProOpenAI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 32 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~67.01provisional score
GPT-5.3 InstantOpenAI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 35 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~58.9provisional score
Grok 4.1 FastxAI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~51.25provisional score
DeepSeek V3.1DeepSeek0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~53.64provisional score
Mistral Large 3Mistral0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~50.4provisional score
GLM-4.5Z.AI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~57.56provisional score
DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~51.67provisional score
GPT-5.3-Codex-SparkOpenAI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 44 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~56.91provisional score
Step 3.5 FlashStepFun0 sourced · 0 rankable · 50 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~55.1provisional score
o1-previewOpenAI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~49.11provisional score
GLM-4.5-AirZ.AI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~47.7provisional score
GLM-4.7-FlashZ.AI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 45 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~51.25provisional score
Gemma 3 27BGoogle0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~41.57provisional score
Mistral Small 4Mistral0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~46.23provisional score
DeepSeek LLM 2.0DeepSeek0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~54.53provisional score
Mercury 2Inception0 sourced · 0 rankable · 48 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~51.28provisional score
GPT-5 (medium)OpenAI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~55.15provisional score
Claude 3 OpusAnthropic0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~41.13provisional score
Nemotron 3 Nano 30BNVIDIA0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~52.94provisional score
GPT-4o miniOpenAI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~37.87provisional score
Mistral Large 2Mistral0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~41.77provisional score
Qwen2.5-72BAlibaba0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~52.15provisional score
Llama 3.1 405BMeta0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~51.71provisional score
Llama 3 70BMeta0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~50.82provisional score
DeepSeek Coder 2.0DeepSeek0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~50.28provisional score
Seed 1.6ByteDance0 sourced · 0 rankable · 32 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~50.23provisional score
Gemini 1.5 ProGoogle0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~35.71provisional score
Phi-4Microsoft0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~22.69provisional score
Qwen2.5-1MAlibaba0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~49.89provisional score
DeepSeekMath V2DeepSeek0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~49.89provisional score
Seed-2.0-LiteByteDance0 sourced · 0 rankable · 32 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~49.84provisional score
o3-proOpenAI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~48.33provisional score
Ministral 3 14BMistral0 sourced · 0 rankable · 48 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~34.47provisional score
Aion-2.0Aion Labs0 sourced · 0 rankable · 32 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~48.66provisional score
Grok Code Fast 1xAI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~38.64provisional score
GPT-4 TurboOpenAI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~27.44provisional score
Z-1Z0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~45.13provisional score
Seed 1.6 FlashByteDance0 sourced · 0 rankable · 32 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~45.08provisional score
Nemotron-4 15BNVIDIA0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~45.08provisional score
Mistral 8x7BMistral0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~44.99provisional score
Moonshot v1Moonshot AI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~44.79provisional score
Seed-2.0-MiniByteDance0 sourced · 0 rankable · 32 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~44.6provisional score
Nemotron Ultra 253BNVIDIA0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~44.4provisional score
Gemini 1.0 ProGoogle0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~21.78provisional score
Claude 3 HaikuAnthropic0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~21.39provisional score
LFM2-24B-A2BLiquidAI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 43 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~18.87provisional score
Claude 4.1 Opus ThinkingAnthropic0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~36.55provisional score
Nova ProAmazon0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~20.32provisional score
Ministral 3 8BMistral0 sourced · 0 rankable · 48 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~20.96provisional score
Mistral 7B v0.3Mistral0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~39.9provisional score
Qwen2.5-VL-32BAlibaba0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~39.85provisional score
Llama 4 BehemothMeta0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~39.8provisional score
LFM2.5-1.2B-ThinkingLiquidAI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 43 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~16.23provisional score
MiniMax M1 80kMiniMax0 sourced · 0 rankable · 43 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~25.12provisional score
Ministral 3 3BMistral0 sourced · 0 rankable · 48 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~18.27provisional score
Mistral 8x7B v0.2Mistral0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~39.13provisional score
LFM2.5-1.2B-InstructLiquidAI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 43 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~15.52provisional score
Hy3Tencent0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~55.64provisional score
Gemma 4 E2BGoogle0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~41.82provisional score
Gemma 4 E4BGoogle0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~43.2provisional score
Sarvam 105BSarvam0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~42.97provisional score
Sarvam 30BSarvam0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~40.7provisional score
Mistral Medium 3Mistral0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~43.2provisional score
Granite-4.0-350MIBM0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~38.32provisional score
Granite-4.0-H-350MIBM0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~38.32provisional score
GPT-5 nanoOpenAI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 28 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~46.36provisional score
o1-proOpenAI0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~45.94provisional score
Exaone 4.0 1.2BLG AI Research0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~39.06provisional score
K-ExaoneLG AI Research0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~48.45provisional score
Solar Pro 2Upstage0 sourced · 0 rankable · 0 generated
●○○○Low / Estimated~41.19provisional score

Sourced = exact-source benchmark coverage. Rankable = non-generated benchmark coverage used by the provisional leaderboard. Generated = inferred from related models and excluded from ranking. Coverage = sourced share of the visible benchmark footprint.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is benchmark confidence on BenchLM?

Score confidence (1-4 dots) indicates how much sourced benchmark data supports a model's score. A 4-dot score has at least 20 sourced rows across seven categories. A 1-dot score has limited coverage. Some benchmark-sparse models can appear provisionally when several independent public evaluation families agree.

What does "estimated" mean on BenchLM scores?

Scores marked with "Est." or "~" have limited source-backed benchmark coverage or qualify through corroborating external evaluation families. Unresolved manual values and generated rows cannot score. The verified leaderboard requires sourced benchmark support; external consensus alone never upgrades an estimated row to verified status.

How does BenchLM detect contamination risk?

BenchLM tracks two key signals: (1) benchmark provenance — whether each score is a hand-entered public row ("manual") or was generated/inferred from related data, and (2) benchmark freshness — older benchmarks that haven't been updated are more likely to have been contaminated through training data inclusion. Models with mostly generated data or stale benchmarks receive lower confidence ratings. Exact-source verification is tracked separately from this manual-vs-generated split.

What is benchmark provenance?

Provenance records where each benchmark value came from and whether the exact model, benchmark variant, harness, and score can be supported. Source-backed rows can score. Unresolved manual values and generated estimates remain in the audit trail but do not affect either public ranking view.

Which LLM benchmarks are most reliable?

Fresh, held-out benchmarks like SWE-Rebench (rolling window), Terminal-Bench 2.0, and HLE are the hardest to game. Older, saturated benchmarks like MMLU (where top models all score 97-99%) provide little signal. BenchLM weights newer, harder benchmarks more heavily and flags saturated ones as display-only.

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.