Skip to main content

Model profile

Solar Pro 2

UpstageTrackedKorea-market model
Data verified
Overall Score
41.19Public #167 of 200
Arena Elo
Not listed
Eligible category ranks
0of 8
Price (1M tokens)
Not listedAPI pricing
Speed
Not listed
Context
128K

Evidence coverage

11 of 323 tracked benchmarks are published. 0 are verified and 11 provisional. 5 of 8 categories are measured.

Updated July 23, 2026Methodology
Published / tracked
11 / 323
Verified
0
Provisional
11
Categories with evidence
5 / 8

Evidence by category

  • Agentic1 benchmark
    Reported
  • Coding1 benchmark
    Reported
  • Reasoning2 benchmarks
    Reported
  • Knowledge6 benchmarks
    Reported
  • Math0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Multilingual0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Multimodal0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Inst. Following1 benchmark
    Reported
ProprietaryReasoning
Confidence:
Low

BenchLM tracks Solar Pro 2 as a regional Korea model. Its benchmark rows are published for direct inspection, but it is intentionally excluded from the public global leaderboard so local-market scores do not skew worldwide rankings.

Solar Pro 2 is a proprietary model with a 128K token context window. It uses explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, which typically improves performance on math and complex reasoning tasks at the cost of higher latency and token usage.

This profile currently has 11 of 323 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

Peer position

Exact provisional scores and ranks for the closest listed peers. A score can appear before a model clears the evidence threshold for a rank, so equal scores can have different rank states.

Range 39.0648.45

  1. K-Exaone
    LG AI Research
    #12648.45
    K-Exaone is #126 with a score of 48.45.
    Compare
  2. Solar Pro 2Current model
    Upstage
    #16741.19
    Solar Pro 2 is #167 with a score of 41.19.
  3. Exaone 4.0 32B
    LG AI Research
    #17040.44
    Exaone 4.0 32B is #170 with a score of 40.44.
    Compare
  4. Exaone 4.0 1.2B
    LG AI Research
    #17939.06
    Exaone 4.0 1.2B is #179 with a score of 39.06.
    Compare

Category percentile

More

Relative position among models eligible for each sourced category. A higher percentile means a stronger position within that category's ranked cohort; 100 is highest.

No eligible category percentile is available from the published evidence yet.

Category evidence

Scores and ranks appear only where this model has published benchmark evidence. Categories without displayable source records remain not measured.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticWeight 22%1 benchmarkReportedScore pending
CodingWeight 20%1 benchmarkReportedScore pending
ReasoningWeight 17%2 benchmarksReportedScore pending
KnowledgeWeight 12%6 benchmarksReportedScore pending
MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%1 benchmarkReportedScore pending

Benchmark Details

Rows below have a displayable published verification record. Each source link and provenance note remains in the page HTML while its category is closed. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows stay hidden.

Agentic1 benchmark
τ²-bench resultsReported

τ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation

31.9%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Coding1 benchmark
AA-SciCodeReported

Artificial Analysis SciCode

24.8%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Reasoning2 benchmarks
AA-LCRReported

Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning

0.0%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
CritPtReported

Critical Physics Tasks

0.0%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Knowledge6 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexReported
7.8%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-GPQA DiamondReported

Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond

56.1%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-HLEReported

Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam

3.8%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-Omniscience IndexReported

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index

-61.7%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-Omniscience AccuracyReported

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy

15.6%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateReported

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate

91.5%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Inst. Following1 benchmark
AA-IFBenchReported

Artificial Analysis IFBench

33.7%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Solar Pro 2 perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Solar Pro 2 is tracked as a regional Korea model on BenchLM. Its Korean benchmark scores are visible on the model profile and Korean leaderboards, but it is intentionally excluded from the global overall ranking so regional results do not distort worldwide comparisons.

Is Solar Pro 2 good for knowledge and understanding?

Solar Pro 2 has visible benchmark coverage in knowledge and understanding, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Solar Pro 2 good for coding and programming?

Solar Pro 2 has visible benchmark coverage in coding and programming, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Solar Pro 2 good for reasoning and logic?

Solar Pro 2 has visible benchmark coverage in reasoning and logic, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Solar Pro 2 good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?

Solar Pro 2 has visible benchmark coverage in agentic tool use and computer tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Solar Pro 2 good for instruction following?

Solar Pro 2 has visible benchmark coverage in instruction following, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Does Solar Pro 2 have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

Not yet. Solar Pro 2 currently has 11 published benchmark scores out of the 323 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

What is the context window size of Solar Pro 2?

Solar Pro 2 has a published context window of 128K, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.

Last updated: July 23, 2026 · Runtime metrics stay blank until BenchLM has a sourced snapshot.

Choose with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, new releases, pricing changes, and the evidence behind them.

Free. One email per week.