Skip to main content

Model profile

MiMo-V2-Pro

XiaomiSupersededReleased Mar 18, 2026
Data verified
Superseded:Xiaomi has released newer models in this line —MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Overall Score
67.78Public #17 of 200Verified #15 of 99
Arena Elo
1448
Eligible category ranks
1of 8
Price (1M tokens)
Not listedAPI pricing
Speed
Not listed
Context
1M

Evidence coverage

15 of 323 tracked benchmarks are published. 3 are verified and 12 provisional. 5 of 8 categories are measured.

Updated July 23, 2026Methodology
Published / tracked
15 / 323
Verified
3
Provisional
12
Categories with evidence
5 / 8

Evidence by category

  • Agentic4 benchmarks
    Mixed evidence
  • Coding2 benchmarks
    Reported
  • Reasoning2 benchmarks
    Reported
  • Knowledge6 benchmarks
    Reported
  • Math0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Multilingual0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Multimodal0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Inst. Following1 benchmark
    Reported
ProprietaryReasoning
Confidence:
Low
base

MiMo-V2-Pro ranks #17 out of 200 models on the public leaderboard with an overall score of 67.78/100. It also ranks #15 out of 99 on the verified leaderboard. This places it in the mid-tier of AI models, with strengths in specific benchmark categories.

MiMo-V2-Pro is a proprietary model with a 1M token context window. It uses explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, which typically improves performance on math and complex reasoning tasks at the cost of higher latency and token usage.

This profile currently has 15 of 323 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

Its strongest category is Coding (#17). This performance profile makes it particularly well-suited for software development and code generation tasks.

Peer position

Exact provisional scores and ranks for the closest listed peers. A score can appear before a model clears the evidence threshold for a rank, so equal scores can have different rank states.

Range 67.0167.78

  1. MiMo-V2-ProCurrent model
    Xiaomi
    #1767.78
    MiMo-V2-Pro is #17 with a score of 67.78.
  2. GLM-5.1
    Z.AI
    #1867.74
    GLM-5.1 is #18 with a score of 67.74.
    Compare
  3. Gemini 3 Pro
    Google
    #1967.73
    Gemini 3 Pro is #19 with a score of 67.73.
    Compare
  4. Inkling
    Thinking Machines Lab
    #2067.54
    Inkling is #20 with a score of 67.54.
    Compare
  5. Qwen3.7 Plus
    Alibaba
    #2167.22
    Qwen3.7 Plus is #21 with a score of 67.22.
    Compare
  6. GPT-5.6 Luna
    OpenAI
    #2267.17
    GPT-5.6 Luna is #22 with a score of 67.17.
    Compare
  7. GPT-5.2 Pro
    OpenAI
    #2367.01
    GPT-5.2 Pro is #23 with a score of 67.01.
    Compare

Category percentile

More

Relative position among models eligible for each sourced category. A higher percentile means a stronger position within that category's ranked cohort; 100 is highest.

  1. Coding87%
    Eligible cohort rank #17 of 122Category score 62.6

Category evidence

Scores and ranks appear only where this model has published benchmark evidence. Categories without displayable source records remain not measured.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticRank Not rankedWeight 22%4 benchmarksMixed sources86.7
CodingRank #17 of 122Percentile 87thWeight 20%2 benchmarksReported62.6
ReasoningWeight 17%2 benchmarksReportedScore pending
KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%6 benchmarksReported87.0
MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
Inst. FollowingRank Not rankedWeight 5%1 benchmarkReported68.5

Chatbot Arena performance

Scroll horizontally to inspect confidence intervals and vote counts.

Chatbot Arena Elo, confidence interval, and vote count by evaluation view
ViewEloConfidence intervalVotes
Text Overall1448±4.824,478
Coding1503±7.86,957
Math1451±14.81,622
Instruction Following1445±7.37,980
Creative Writing1425±10.53,569
Multi-turn1470±9.54,436
Hard Prompts1476±5.815,743
Hard Prompts (English)1490±7.57,523
Longer Query1467±7.19,413

Benchmark Details

Rows below have a displayable published verification record. Each source link and provenance note remains in the page HTML while its category is closed. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows stay hidden.

Agentic4 benchmarks
Claw-EvalBenchmark exact
57.8%Display only
Source: Claw-Eval leaderboardProvenance: Claw-Eval reports this model as mimo_v2_pro in the official 2026-05-09 leaderboard snapshot. BenchLM stores the primary Pass^3 value on the local Claw-Eval display key.
τ²-bench resultsReported

τ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation

95%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Gert LabsBenchmark exact

Gert Labs Composite Game Benchmark

36.68%Display only
Source: Gert Labs rankingsProvenance: Gert Labs reports this composite leaderboard score in the public rankings API. BenchLM scales the source gscore from 0-1 to 0-100 and stores it as a display-only agentic benchmark.
ResearchClawBenchBenchmark exact
15.3%Display only
Source: ResearchClawBench leaderboardProvenance: ResearchClawBench reports this model as ResearchHarness (MiMo-V2-Pro) in the official Pass@1 leaderboard. BenchLM stores the one-decimal RADS average on the local ResearchClawBench display key and excludes it from weighted rankings.
Coding2 benchmarks
SWE-bench VerifiedReported

Software Engineering Benchmark Verified

78%Weighted 16%
Source: Reported upstream sourceProvenance: Reported row carried from an upstream public source. Displayable on BenchLM, but not treated as verified unless explicitly marked otherwise.
AA-SciCodeReported

Artificial Analysis SciCode

42.5%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Reasoning2 benchmarks
AA-LCRReported

Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning

60.7%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
CritPtReported

Critical Physics Tasks

0.3%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Knowledge6 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexReported
40.3%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-GPQA DiamondReported

Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond

87.0%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-HLEReported

Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam

28.3%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-Omniscience IndexReported

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index

4.9%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-Omniscience AccuracyReported

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy

26.8%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateReported

Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate

29.9%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.
Inst. Following1 benchmark
AA-IFBenchReported

Artificial Analysis IFBench

68.8%Display only
Source: Artificial Analysis model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only row synced from the current Artificial Analysis model payload. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does MiMo-V2-Pro perform overall in AI benchmarks?

MiMo-V2-Pro has 15 published benchmark scores on BenchLM, but it does not yet have enough non-generated coverage to receive a global overall rank.

Is MiMo-V2-Pro good for knowledge and understanding?

MiMo-V2-Pro has visible benchmark coverage in knowledge and understanding, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is MiMo-V2-Pro good for coding and programming?

MiMo-V2-Pro ranks #17 out of 122 models in coding and programming benchmarks with an average score of 62.6. There are stronger options in this category.

Is MiMo-V2-Pro good for reasoning and logic?

MiMo-V2-Pro has visible benchmark coverage in reasoning and logic, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is MiMo-V2-Pro good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?

MiMo-V2-Pro has visible benchmark coverage in agentic tool use and computer tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is MiMo-V2-Pro good for instruction following?

MiMo-V2-Pro has visible benchmark coverage in instruction following, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Does MiMo-V2-Pro have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

Not yet. MiMo-V2-Pro currently has 15 published benchmark scores out of the 323 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

What is the context window size of MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro has a published context window of 1M, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.

Last updated: July 23, 2026 · Runtime metrics stay blank until BenchLM has a sourced snapshot.

Choose with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, new releases, pricing changes, and the evidence behind them.

Free. One email per week.