Model profile
Claude Opus 4.7
Evidence coverage
21 of 323 tracked benchmarks are published. 8 are verified and 13 provisional. 7 of 8 categories are measured.
- Published / tracked
- 21 / 323
- Verified
- 8
- Provisional
- 13
- Categories with evidence
- 7 / 8
Evidence by category
- Agentic4 benchmarksMixed evidence
- Coding4 benchmarksMixed evidence
- Reasoning2 benchmarksReported
- Knowledge6 benchmarksReported
- Math2 benchmarksVerified
- Multilingual0 benchmarksNot measured
- Multimodal2 benchmarksReported
- Inst. Following1 benchmarkReported
Claude Opus 4.7 ranks #12 out of 200 models on the public leaderboard with an overall score of 71.94/100. It also ranks #10 out of 99 on the verified leaderboard. This places it in the upper tier of AI models, with competitive scores across most benchmark categories.
Claude Opus 4.7 is a proprietary model with a 1M token context window. It processes queries without explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, offering faster response times and lower token usage.
Claude Opus 4.7 sits inside the Claude Opus 4.7 family alongside Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive). BenchLM links it directly to Claude Opus 4.6 as the earlier related model in that lineage. This profile currently has 21 of 323 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.
Its strongest category is Coding (#8), while its weakest is Knowledge (#36). This performance profile makes it particularly well-suited for software development and code generation tasks.
Peer position
Exact provisional scores and ranks for the closest listed peers. A score can appear before a model clears the evidence threshold for a rank, so equal scores can have different rank states.
Range 69.75–73.51
- GPT-5.5OpenAICompare#973.51GPT-5.5 is #9 with a score of 73.51.
- Qwen3.7 MaxAlibabaCompare#1072.84Qwen3.7 Max is #10 with a score of 72.84.
- GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAICompare#1172.57GPT-5.6 Terra is #11 with a score of 72.57.
- Claude Opus 4.7Current modelAnthropic#1271.94Claude Opus 4.7 is #12 with a score of 71.94.
- Muse SparkMetaCompare#1371.04Muse Spark is #13 with a score of 71.04.
- MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomiCompare#1470.19MiMo-V2.5-Pro is #14 with a score of 70.19.
- MiniMax M3MiniMaxCompare#1569.75MiniMax M3 is #15 with a score of 69.75.
Category percentile
More
Relative position among models eligible for each sourced category. A higher percentile means a stronger position within that category's ranked cohort; 100 is highest.
- Coding94%Eligible cohort rank #8 of 122Category score 68.4
- Agentic82%Eligible cohort rank #22 of 119Category score 54.8
- Knowledge31%Eligible cohort rank #36 of 52Category score 64.6
Category evidence
Scores and ranks appear only where this model has published benchmark evidence. Categories without displayable source records remain not measured.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #22 of 119Percentile 82ndWeight 22%4 benchmarksMixed sources | 54.8 | #22 of 119 | 82nd | 22% | 4 benchmarks | Mixed sources |
| CodingRank #8 of 122Percentile 94thWeight 20%4 benchmarksMixed sources | 68.4 | #8 of 122 | 94th | 20% | 4 benchmarks | Mixed sources |
| ReasoningWeight 17%2 benchmarksReported | Score pending | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 2 benchmarks | Reported |
| KnowledgeRank #36 of 52Percentile 31stWeight 12%6 benchmarksReported | 64.6 | #36 of 52 | 31st | 12% | 6 benchmarks | Reported |
| MathRank Not rankedWeight 5%2 benchmarksVerified | 61.9 | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 2 benchmarks | Verified |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%2 benchmarksReported | Score pending | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 2 benchmarks | Reported |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%1 benchmarkReported | Score pending | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 1 benchmark | Reported |
Chatbot Arena performance
Scroll horizontally to inspect confidence intervals and vote counts.
| View | Elo | Confidence interval | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text Overall | 1494 | ±4.2 | 50,890 |
| Coding | 1549 | ±6.5 | 14,491 |
| Math | 1493 | ±12.2 | 2,627 |
| Instruction Following | 1493 | ±6.1 | 17,352 |
| Creative Writing | 1483 | ±7.9 | 8,647 |
| Multi-turn | 1519 | ±7.7 | 9,076 |
| Hard Prompts | 1519 | ±5.0 | 33,785 |
| Hard Prompts (English) | 1522 | ±6.2 | 16,679 |
| Longer Query | 1509 | ±5.9 | 22,653 |
Benchmark Details
Rows below have a displayable published verification record. Each source link and provenance note remains in the page HTML while its category is closed. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows stay hidden.
Agentic4 benchmarks
τ²-Bench Tool-Agent-User Evaluation
Gert Labs Composite Game Benchmark
Coding4 benchmarks
Vibe Code Bench v1.1
Artificial Analysis SciCode
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning
Critical Physics Tasks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis GPQA Diamond
Artificial Analysis Humanity's Last Exam
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Index
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Accuracy
Artificial Analysis Omniscience Hallucination Rate
Math2 benchmarks
FrontierMath v2 Tiers 1-3
FrontierMath v2 Tier 4
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Artificial Analysis MMMU-Pro
Design Arena Website Elo
Inst. Following1 benchmark
Artificial Analysis IFBench
Frequently Asked Questions
How does Claude Opus 4.7 perform overall in AI benchmarks?
Claude Opus 4.7 has 21 published benchmark scores on BenchLM, but it does not yet have enough non-generated coverage to receive a global overall rank.
Is Claude Opus 4.7 good for knowledge and understanding?
Claude Opus 4.7 ranks #36 out of 52 models in knowledge and understanding benchmarks with an average score of 64.6. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Claude Opus 4.7 good for coding and programming?
Claude Opus 4.7 ranks #8 out of 122 models in coding and programming benchmarks with an average score of 68.4. It is among the top performers in this category.
Is Claude Opus 4.7 good for mathematics?
Claude Opus 4.7 has visible benchmark coverage in mathematics, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is Claude Opus 4.7 good for reasoning and logic?
Claude Opus 4.7 has visible benchmark coverage in reasoning and logic, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is Claude Opus 4.7 good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
Claude Opus 4.7 ranks #22 out of 119 models in agentic tool use and computer tasks benchmarks with an average score of 54.8. There are stronger options in this category.
Is Claude Opus 4.7 good for multimodal and grounded tasks?
Claude Opus 4.7 has visible benchmark coverage in multimodal and grounded tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Is Claude Opus 4.7 good for instruction following?
Claude Opus 4.7 has visible benchmark coverage in instruction following, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.
Which sibling models are related to Claude Opus 4.7?
Claude Opus 4.7 belongs to the Claude Opus 4.7 family. Related variants on BenchLM include Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive).
Does Claude Opus 4.7 have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
Not yet. Claude Opus 4.7 currently has 21 published benchmark scores out of the 323 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.
What is the context window size of Claude Opus 4.7?
Claude Opus 4.7 has a published context window of 1M, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.
Related Resources
Choose with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, new releases, pricing changes, and the evidence behind them.
Free. One email per week.