Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 3 Pro vs Muse Spark

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 19 shared benchmark results across 7 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

67.73/100
Margin
3.3pts
winning →
71.04/100
0 category wins2 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3 Pro #19 (Supported); Muse Spark #13 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 3 Pro and Muse Spark share 19 comparable benchmark results. 3 of 8 categories are comparable. 8 results are unique to Gemini 3 Pro; 20 to Muse Spark.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
19
Gemini 3 Pro only
8
Muse Spark only
20
Comparable categories
3 / 8

Pick Muse Spark if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemini 3 Pro only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 2M context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 19 shared benchmark results across 7 evidence categories; 3 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Muse Spark is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 71.04 to 67.73. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Muse Spark's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 42.5 against 31.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is ARC-AGI-2, 31.1% to 42.5%.

Muse Spark is the reasoning model in the pair, while Gemini 3 Pro is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Gemini 3 Pro gives you the larger context window at 2M, compared with 262K for Muse Spark.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 3 Pro and Muse Spark
CategoryGemini 3 ProΔMuse Spark
ReasoningGemini 3 Pro31.1Margin 11.4Muse Spark42.5
MultimodalGemini 3 Pro81.1Margin 1.4Muse Spark82.5
MathGemini 3 Pro32.9MarginTieMuse Spark32.9
AgenticGemini 3 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapMuse Spark59.0
CodingGemini 3 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapMuse Spark67.8
KnowledgeGemini 3 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapMuse Spark50.4

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Gemini 3 ProB · Muse Spark
  1. ARC-AGI-2

    Reasoning
    Source ↗
    A 31.1%B 42.5%
    Winner: Muse SparkΔ 11.4
    ARC-AGI-2: Gemini 3 Pro scored 31.1%; Muse Spark scored 42.5%. Muse Spark wins this benchmark.
  2. CharXiv

    Multimodal
    Source ↗
    A 81.4%B 86.4%
    Winner: Muse SparkΔ 5
    CharXiv: Gemini 3 Pro scored 81.4%; Muse Spark scored 86.4%. Muse Spark wins this benchmark.
  3. FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)

    Math
    Source ↗
    A 18.750%B 14.600%
    Winner: Gemini 3 ProΔ 4.2
    FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4): Gemini 3 Pro scored 18.750%; Muse Spark scored 14.600%. Gemini 3 Pro wins this benchmark.
  4. FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)

    Math
    Source ↗
    A 37.600%B 39.000%
    Winner: Muse SparkΔ 1.4
    FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3): Gemini 3 Pro scored 37.600%; Muse Spark scored 39.000%. Muse Spark wins this benchmark.
  5. MMMU-Pro

    Multimodal
    Source ↗
    A 81%B 80.4%
    Winner: Gemini 3 ProΔ 0.6
    MMMU-Pro: Gemini 3 Pro scored 81%; Muse Spark scored 80.4%. Gemini 3 Pro wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 3 ProMuse SparkComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 3 Pro$2 input / $12 outputMuse SparkNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 3 Pro109 tok/sMuse SparkNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 3 Pro32.65 sMuse SparkNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 3 Pro2MMuse Spark262KGemini 3 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProMuse SparkResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 87.1%91.5%Muse Spark leads
Gert LabsSource 63.23%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 11.4%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 59%Not comparable
DeepSearchQASource 74.8%Not comparable
CyberGymSource 43.5%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 63.8%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 28.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 32.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1144Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProMuse SparkResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 14.30%19.67%Muse Spark leads
AA-SciCodeSource 56.1%51.5%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA LiveCodeBenchSource 91.7%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 77.4%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 52.4%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench ProSource 80.0%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 58.6%Not comparable
ReasoningMuse Spark wins
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProMuse SparkResult
ARC-AGI-2Source 31.1%42.5%Muse Spark leads
AA-LCRSource 70.7%69.7%Gemini 3 Pro leads
CritPtSource 9.1%11.3%Muse Spark leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProMuse SparkResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 39.5%43.1%Muse Spark leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 90.8%88.4%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-HLESource 37.2%39.9%Muse Spark leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 15.8%4.1%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 55.9%44.6%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 90.9%73.2%Muse Spark leads
AA MMLU-ProSource 89.8%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 89.5%Not comparable
HLESource 50.4%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 42.8%Not comparable
HealthBench HardSource 42.8%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (Text)Source 52.6%Not comparable
MathTie
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProMuse SparkResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 37.600%39.000%Muse Spark leads
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 18.750%14.600%Gemini 3 Pro leads
Multilingual
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProMuse SparkResult
AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource 92.2%Not comparable
MultimodalMuse Spark wins
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProMuse SparkResult
MMMU-ProSource 81%80.4%Gemini 3 Pro leads
MathVisionSource 86.6%Not comparable
VideoMMMUSource 87.6%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource 72.7%84.1%Muse Spark leads
CharXivSource 81.4%86.4%Muse Spark leads
V*Source 88.0%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 80.2%80.5%Muse Spark leads
ERQASource 64.7%Not comparable
SimpleVQASource 71.3%Not comparable
ZeroBenchSource 33.0%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source 78.4%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProMuse SparkResult
AA-IFBenchSource 70.4%75.9%Muse Spark leads
Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro or Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 71.04 to 67.73. The biggest single separator in this matchup is ARC-AGI-2, where the scores are 31.1% and 42.5%.

Which is better for math, Gemini 3 Pro or Muse Spark?

Gemini 3 Pro and Muse Spark are effectively tied for math here, both landing at 32.9 on average.

Which is better for reasoning, Gemini 3 Pro or Muse Spark?

Muse Spark has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 42.5 versus 31.1. Inside this category, ARC-AGI-2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Gemini 3 Pro or Muse Spark?

Muse Spark has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.5 versus 81.1. Inside this category, ScreenSpot Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.