Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 3 Pro vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 15 shared benchmark results across 7 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

67.73/100
Margin
14.2pts
winning →
81.96/100
0 category wins2 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3 Pro #19 (Supported); GPT-5.6 Sol #3 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 3 Pro and GPT-5.6 Sol share 15 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to Gemini 3 Pro; 31 to GPT-5.6 Sol.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
15
Gemini 3 Pro only
12
GPT-5.6 Sol only
31
Comparable categories
2 / 8

Pick GPT-5.6 Sol if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemini 3 Pro only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you need the larger 2M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 15 shared benchmark results across 7 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

GPT-5.6 Sol is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 81.96 to 67.73. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.6 Sol's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 87.5 against 32.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4), 18.750% to 83.000%.

GPT-5.6 Sol is also the more expensive model on tokens at $5.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $2.00 input / $12.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemini 3 Pro. That is roughly 2.5x on output cost alone. GPT-5.6 Sol is the reasoning model in the pair, while Gemini 3 Pro is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Gemini 3 Pro gives you the larger context window at 2M, compared with 1M for GPT-5.6 Sol.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 3 Pro and GPT-5.6 Sol
CategoryGemini 3 ProΔGPT-5.6 Sol
MathGemini 3 Pro32.9Margin 54.6GPT-5.6 Sol87.5
MultimodalGemini 3 Pro81.1Margin 1.9GPT-5.6 Sol83.0
AgenticGemini 3 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.6 Sol92.0
CodingGemini 3 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.6 Sol64.6
ReasoningGemini 3 Pro31.1MarginNo overlapGPT-5.6 SolNot measured
KnowledgeGemini 3 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.6 Sol94.6

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Gemini 3 ProB · GPT-5.6 Sol
  1. FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)

    Math
    Source ↗
    A 18.750%B 83.000%
    Winner: GPT-5.6 SolΔ 64.3
    FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4): Gemini 3 Pro scored 18.750%; GPT-5.6 Sol scored 83.000%. GPT-5.6 Sol wins this benchmark.
  2. FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)

    Math
    Source ↗
    A 37.600%B 89.000%
    Winner: GPT-5.6 SolΔ 51.4
    FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3): Gemini 3 Pro scored 37.600%; GPT-5.6 Sol scored 89.000%. GPT-5.6 Sol wins this benchmark.
  3. MMMU-Pro

    Multimodal
    Source ↗
    A 81%B 83%
    Winner: GPT-5.6 SolΔ 2
    MMMU-Pro: Gemini 3 Pro scored 81%; GPT-5.6 Sol scored 83%. GPT-5.6 Sol wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 3 ProGPT-5.6 SolComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 3 Pro$2 input / $12 outputGPT-5.6 Sol$5 input / $30 outputGemini 3 Pro has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 3 Pro109 tok/sGPT-5.6 SolNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 3 Pro32.65 sGPT-5.6 SolNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 3 Pro2MGPT-5.6 Sol1MGemini 3 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGPT-5.6 SolResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 87.1%85.1%Gemini 3 Pro leads
Gert LabsSource 63.23%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 11.4%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 91.9%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 92.2%Not comparable
OSWorld 2.0Source 62.6%Not comparable
CyberGymSource 84.5%Not comparable
ExploitGymSource 33.7%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 58%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 54.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 61.8%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1736Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 1501Not comparable
AA ITBenchSource 56.2%Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 33.0%Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource 51.2%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 87.2%Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource 65.9%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source 88%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGPT-5.6 SolResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 14.30%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 56.1%56.1%Tie
AA LiveCodeBenchSource 91.7%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 64.6%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 91.9%Not comparable
deepSweSource 72.7%Not comparable
FrontierCode 1.1 ExtendedSource 60.6%Not comparable
cursorBench32Source 67.2%Not comparable
VulcanBench v3Source 87.0%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 77.4%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGPT-5.6 SolResult
ARC-AGI-2Source 31.1%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 70.7%73.7%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
CritPtSource 9.1%32.3%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
ARC-AGI-3Source 7.8%Not comparable
GeneBench-ProSource 28.7%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGPT-5.6 SolResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 39.5%58.9%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 90.8%94.1%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
AA-HLESource 37.2%47.2%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 15.8%21.7%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 55.9%58.5%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 90.9%88.8%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
AA MMLU-ProSource 89.8%Not comparable
GPQASource 94.6%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 94.6%Not comparable
HealthBench ProfessionalSource 60.5%Not comparable
HealthBench HardSource 33.1%Not comparable
MathGPT-5.6 Sol wins
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGPT-5.6 SolResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 37.600%89.000%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 18.750%83.000%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
FrontierMath (legacy)Source 89%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGPT-5.6 SolResult
AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource 92.2%Not comparable
MultimodalGPT-5.6 Sol wins
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGPT-5.6 SolResult
MMMU-ProSource 81%83%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
MathVisionSource 86.6%Not comparable
VideoMMMUSource 87.6%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource 72.7%Not comparable
CharXivSource 81.4%Not comparable
V*Source 88.0%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 80.2%83.4%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
MMMU-Pro w/ PythonSource 84.6%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGPT-5.6 SolResult
AA-IFBenchSource 70.4%72.7%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro or GPT-5.6 Sol?

GPT-5.6 Sol is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 81.96 to 67.73. The biggest single separator in this matchup is FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4), where the scores are 18.750% and 83.000%.

Which is better for math, Gemini 3 Pro or GPT-5.6 Sol?

GPT-5.6 Sol has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 87.5 versus 32.9. Inside this category, FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Gemini 3 Pro or GPT-5.6 Sol?

GPT-5.6 Sol has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 83 versus 81.1. Inside this category, AA-MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.