Skip to main content

Model comparison

Gemini 3 Pro vs GPT-5.4 Pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 5 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

67.73/100
Margin
6.8pts
← winning
60.89/100
0 category wins3 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3 Pro #19 (Supported); GPT-5.4 Pro #44 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 3 Pro and GPT-5.4 Pro share 5 comparable benchmark results. 3 of 8 categories are comparable. 22 results are unique to Gemini 3 Pro; 7 to GPT-5.4 Pro.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
5
Gemini 3 Pro only
22
GPT-5.4 Pro only
7
Comparable categories
3 / 8

Pick Gemini 3 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 Pro only becomes the better choice if reasoning is the priority or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 5 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 3 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Gemini 3 Pro is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 67.73 to 60.89. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.4 Pro is also the more expensive model on tokens at $30.00 input / $180.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $2.00 input / $12.00 output per 1M tokens for Gemini 3 Pro. That is roughly 15.0x on output cost alone. GPT-5.4 Pro is the reasoning model in the pair, while Gemini 3 Pro is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Gemini 3 Pro gives you the larger context window at 2M, compared with 1.05M for GPT-5.4 Pro.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 3 Pro and GPT-5.4 Pro
CategoryGemini 3 ProΔGPT-5.4 Pro
ReasoningGemini 3 Pro31.1Margin 52.2GPT-5.4 Pro83.3
MathGemini 3 Pro32.9Margin 14.0GPT-5.4 Pro46.9
MultimodalGemini 3 Pro81.1Margin 12.9GPT-5.4 Pro94.0
AgenticGemini 3 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.4 Pro89.3
KnowledgeGemini 3 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.4 Pro58.7

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Gemini 3 ProB · GPT-5.4 Pro
  1. ARC-AGI-2

    Reasoning
    Source ↗
    A 31.1%B 83.3%
    Winner: GPT-5.4 ProΔ 52.2
    ARC-AGI-2: Gemini 3 Pro scored 31.1%; GPT-5.4 Pro scored 83.3%. GPT-5.4 Pro wins this benchmark.
  2. FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)

    Math
    Source ↗
    A 18.750%B 37.500%
    Winner: GPT-5.4 ProΔ 18.8
    FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4): Gemini 3 Pro scored 18.750%; GPT-5.4 Pro scored 37.500%. GPT-5.4 Pro wins this benchmark.
  3. MMMU-Pro

    Multimodal
    Source ↗
    A 81%B 94%
    Winner: GPT-5.4 ProΔ 13
    MMMU-Pro: Gemini 3 Pro scored 81%; GPT-5.4 Pro scored 94%. GPT-5.4 Pro wins this benchmark.
  4. FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)

    Math
    Source ↗
    A 37.600%B 50.000%
    Winner: GPT-5.4 ProΔ 12.4
    FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3): Gemini 3 Pro scored 37.600%; GPT-5.4 Pro scored 50.000%. GPT-5.4 Pro wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 3 ProGPT-5.4 ProComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 3 Pro$2 input / $12 outputGPT-5.4 Pro$30 input / $180 outputGemini 3 Pro has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 3 Pro109 tok/sGPT-5.4 Pro74 tok/sGemini 3 Pro has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 3 Pro32.65 sGPT-5.4 Pro151.79 sGemini 3 Pro reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 3 Pro2MGPT-5.4 Pro1.05MGemini 3 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGPT-5.4 ProResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 87.1%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 63.23%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 11.4%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 89.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGPT-5.4 ProResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 14.30%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 56.1%Not comparable
AA LiveCodeBenchSource 91.7%Not comparable
ReasoningGPT-5.4 Pro wins
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGPT-5.4 ProResult
ARC-AGI-2Source 31.1%83.3%GPT-5.4 Pro leads
AA-LCRSource 70.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 9.1%30.0%GPT-5.4 Pro leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGPT-5.4 ProResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 39.5%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 90.8%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 37.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 15.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 55.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 90.9%Not comparable
AA MMLU-ProSource 89.8%Not comparable
HLESource 58.7%Not comparable
FrontierScienceSource 36.7%Not comparable
FrontierScience ResearchSource 36.7%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 42.7%Not comparable
MathGPT-5.4 Pro wins
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGPT-5.4 ProResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 37.600%50.000%GPT-5.4 Pro leads
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 18.750%37.500%GPT-5.4 Pro leads
IPhO 2025 (Theory)Source 93.5%Not comparable
FrontierMath (legacy)Source 50%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGPT-5.4 ProResult
AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource 92.2%Not comparable
MultimodalGPT-5.4 Pro wins
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGPT-5.4 ProResult
MMMU-ProSource 81%94%GPT-5.4 Pro leads
MathVisionSource 86.6%Not comparable
VideoMMMUSource 87.6%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource 72.7%Not comparable
CharXivSource 81.4%Not comparable
V*Source 88.0%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 80.2%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProGPT-5.4 ProResult
AA-IFBenchSource 70.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro or GPT-5.4 Pro?

Gemini 3 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 67.73 to 60.89. The biggest single separator in this matchup is ARC-AGI-2, where the scores are 31.1% and 83.3%.

Which is better for math, Gemini 3 Pro or GPT-5.4 Pro?

GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 46.9 versus 32.9. Inside this category, FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Gemini 3 Pro or GPT-5.4 Pro?

GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 83.3 versus 31.1. Inside this category, ARC-AGI-2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Gemini 3 Pro or GPT-5.4 Pro?

GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 94 versus 81.1. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.