Capability
Unranked
field median 58
Not eligible for a public rank
Five or fewer confirmed AI changes, with original sources, on mornings when something changed.A free source-linked morning brief.
Start free briefReleased Jul 21, 2026 — see all recent releases
Data as of August 22, 2026 · How the score is built
Published rows are visible, but no category has enough eligible evidence for a comparative rank.
1 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Capability
Unranked
field median 58
Not eligible for a public rank
Price
API rate not published
input median $1
No comparable first-party hosted token rate
Speed
Not measured
field median 91.5 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
Not published
field median 200,000
No exact-model context limit is sourced
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticWeight 22%1 benchmarkVerified | Score pending | Not ranked | Not available | 22% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| CodingWeight 20%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 20% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Agentic opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CyberGym | Score83.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Fugu Cyber · 86.9% | Gap3.7 behind | WeightDisplay only | Provider exact |
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Jul 21, 2026 · you are here
Gemini 3.5 Flash CyberNot publicly ranked · Price not listed
cyber · Cyber
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
We track Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber, but the public leaderboard excludes this profile until enough non-generated benchmark coverage is available. Only published rows appear above.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is a proprietary model. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
Google says Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber will be available soon through a limited-access CodeMender pilot exclusively for governments and trusted partners, with access expanding over time. Google has not published a standalone API model ID, context-window specification, or token price for this variant.
Official exact-value snapshot from Google DeepMind's July 21, 2026 launch page. Google reports 83.2% pass@1 on CyberGym for Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber in CodeMender with up to five model calls per final report. BenchLM stores this as display-only cybersecurity evidence because it measures the full agent setup rather than the base model alone. Google's 72% Big Sleep result and 72% Chrome production commit-scanning result remain out of the benchmark row because both evaluations are private and do not expose a reproducible public suite.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber sits in the Gemini 3.5 Flash family with Gemini 3.5 Flash. 1 of 402 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Google · Model release
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber has 1 source-displayable benchmark rows, but it does not qualify for a public overall rank. The available rows remain visible by category without being converted into a site-wide score. Missing evidence stays blank instead of being estimated from an earlier model.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber has source-displayable benchmark coverage for agentic tool use and computer tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber belongs to the Gemini 3.5 Flash family. Related tracked variants include Gemini 3.5 Flash. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.
No. Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber currently has 1 source-displayable rows across 402 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber's provider has not published a context-window limit for this exact model. The profile leaves the value unavailable instead of borrowing a number from an earlier family member or a third-party route. Maximum output length is tracked separately when the provider documents it.
Related resources
Last updated August 22, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.