Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B vs Qwen3.7 Max

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 19 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

44.24/100
Margin
28.6pts
winning →
72.84/100
1 category wins2 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B #151 (Estimated); Qwen3.7 Max #10 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Qwen3.7 Max share 19 comparable benchmark results. 3 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B; 39 to Qwen3.7 Max.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
19
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
10
Qwen3.7 Max only
39
Comparable categories
3 / 8

Pick Qwen3.7 Max if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 19 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 3 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Qwen3.7 Max is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 72.84 to 44.24. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.7 Max's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 77.9 against 32. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SciCode, 32% to 53.5%. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen3.7 Max gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Qwen3.7 Max
CategoryNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BΔQwen3.7 Max
CodingNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B32.0Margin→ 45.9Qwen3.7 Max77.9
KnowledgeNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3Margin← 12.1Qwen3.7 Max64.2
Inst. FollowingNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B74.2Margin→ 10.2Qwen3.7 Max84.4
AgenticNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max69.7
ReasoningNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max90.4
MathNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max97.1
MultilingualNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max87.0
MultimodalNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3MarginNo overlapQwen3.7 MaxNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BB · Qwen3.7 Max

  1. SciCode

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 32%B 53.5%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 21.5
    SciCode: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 32%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 53.5%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

  2. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 72.2%B 92.4%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 20.2
    GPQA: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 72.2%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 92.4%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

  3. MMLU-Pro

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 77.3%B 89.6%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 12.3
    MMLU-Pro: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 77.3%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 89.6%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

  4. IFBench

    Inst. Following
    Source ↗
    A 74.2%B 79.1%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 4.9
    IFBench: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 74.2%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 79.1%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 MaxComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B$0 input / $0 outputQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot availableQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot availableQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B256KQwen3.7 Max1MQwen3.7 Max lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 MaxResult
OSWorldSource 47.4%—Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 45.3%94.7%Qwen3.7 Max leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%38.7%Qwen3.7 Max leads
GDPval-AASource 4671273Qwen3.7 Max leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —69.7%Not comparable
QwenClawBenchSource —64.3%Not comparable
QwenWebBenchSource —1568Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource —65.2%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source —75.0%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource —76.4%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource —47.9%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource —53.5%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource —30.6%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource —64.27%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource —18.7%Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource —908Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource —25.6%Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource —45.0%Not comparable
AA ITBenchSource —42.5%Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource —50.8%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source —74.5%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource —83.4%Not comparable
CodingQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 MaxResult
SciCodeSource 32%53.5%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-SciCodeSource 27.8%48.8%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA Coding IndexSource 13.8%66.0%Qwen3.7 Max leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource —80.4%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource —60.6%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource —78.3%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource —47.2%Not comparable
LiveCodeBenchSource —91.6%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —69.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 MaxResult
AA-LCRSource 35.7%69.0%Qwen3.7 Max leads
CritPtSource 0.0%13.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
MRCRv2Source —90.4%Not comparable
KnowledgeNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 MaxResult
MMLU-ProSource 77.3%89.6%Qwen3.7 Max leads
GPQASource 72.2%92.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
GPQA-DSource 72.2%92.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 14.9%46.0%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 46.9%92.3%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-HLESource 5.3%38.1%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -56.0%14.1%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 14.8%30.1%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 83.1%22.9%Qwen3.7 Max leads
HLESource —41.4%Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource —95%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource —73.6%Not comparable
MMMLUSource —90.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 MaxResult
AIME 2025Source 82.1%—Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source —97.1%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource —90.0%Not comparable
ApexSource —44.5%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 MaxResult
MMLU-ProXSource —87%Not comparable
NOVA-63Source —59.0%Not comparable
INCLUDESource —86.2%Not comparable
MAXIFESource —89.2%Not comparable
PolyMathSource —86.5%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 MaxResult
MMMUSource 70.8%—Not comparable
MMLongBench-DocSource 57.5%—Not comparable
CharXivSource 76.3%—Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource 57.8%—Not comparable
Video-MME (w/o subtitle)Source 72.2%—Not comparable
AI2D_TESTSource 88.5%—Not comparable
RefCOCO (avg)Source 90.5%—Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 53.2%—Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1293Not comparable
Inst. FollowingQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BQwen3.7 MaxResult
IFBenchSource 74.2%79.1%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-IFBenchSource 63.2%80.5%Qwen3.7 Max leads
IFEvalSource —94.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 72.84 to 44.24. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SciCode, where the scores are 32% and 53.5%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.7 Max?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.3 versus 64.2. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 77.9 versus 32. Inside this category, AA Coding Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 84.4 versus 74.2. Inside this category, AA-IFBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

NVIDIA Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.