Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
GPT-5.4 Pro
91
Qwen3.7 Max
91
Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-5.4 Pro unranked · Qwen3.7 Max #2
Treat this as a split decision. GPT-5.4 Pro makes more sense if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1.05M context window; Qwen3.7 Max is the better fit if knowledge is the priority.
Agentic
+19.6 difference
Reasoning
+7.1 difference
Knowledge
+22.2 difference
GPT-5.4 Pro
Qwen3.7 Max
$30 / $180
$null / $null
74 t/s
N/A
151.79s
N/A
1.05M
1M
Treat this as a split decision. GPT-5.4 Pro makes more sense if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1.05M context window; Qwen3.7 Max is the better fit if knowledge is the priority.
GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.7 Max finish on the same provisional overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The provisional headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
GPT-5.4 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 1M for Qwen3.7 Max.
GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.7 Max are tied on the provisional overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.2 versus 49. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 90.4 versus 83.3. Inside this category, CritPt is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 89.3 versus 69.7. Qwen3.7 Max stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.