Skip to main content

Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5 vs Ornith-1.0-397B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 4 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Xiaomi
58.62/100
No comparison
DeepReinforce AI
N/A
0 category wins2 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: MiMo-V2.5 #62 (Estimated); Ornith-1.0-397B unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. MiMo-V2.5 and Ornith-1.0-397B share 4 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 7 results are unique to MiMo-V2.5; 3 to Ornith-1.0-397B.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
4
MiMo-V2.5 only
7
Ornith-1.0-397B only
3
Comparable categories
2 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. MiMo-V2.5 makes more sense if you need the larger 1M context window; Ornith-1.0-397B is the better fit if coding is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 4 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

MiMo-V2.5 and Ornith-1.0-397B finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

MiMo-V2.5 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Ornith-1.0-397B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for MiMo-V2.5 and Ornith-1.0-397B
CategoryMiMo-V2.5ΔOrnith-1.0-397B
CodingMiMo-V2.556.1Margin 18.5Ornith-1.0-397B74.6
AgenticMiMo-V2.565.8Margin 11.7Ornith-1.0-397B77.5
MultimodalMiMo-V2.579.0MarginNo overlapOrnith-1.0-397BNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · MiMo-V2.5B · Ornith-1.0-397B
  1. Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 65.8%B 77.5%
    Winner: Ornith-1.0-397BΔ 11.7
    Terminal-Bench 2.0: MiMo-V2.5 scored 65.8%; Ornith-1.0-397B scored 77.5%. Ornith-1.0-397B wins this benchmark.
  2. SWE-bench Pro

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 56.1%B 62.2%
    Winner: Ornith-1.0-397BΔ 6.1
    SWE-bench Pro: MiMo-V2.5 scored 56.1%; Ornith-1.0-397B scored 62.2%. Ornith-1.0-397B wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMiMo-V2.5Ornith-1.0-397BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMiMo-V2.5Not availableOrnith-1.0-397B$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMiMo-V2.5Not availableOrnith-1.0-397BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMiMo-V2.5Not availableOrnith-1.0-397BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMiMo-V2.51MOrnith-1.0-397B256KMiMo-V2.5 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticOrnith-1.0-397B wins
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Ornith-1.0-397BResult
Claw-EvalSource 62.3%77.1%Ornith-1.0-397B leads
MM-ClawBenchSource 23.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%77.5%Ornith-1.0-397B leads
Gert LabsSource 46.89%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 16.9%Not comparable
CodingOrnith-1.0-397B wins
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Ornith-1.0-397BResult
SWE-bench ProSource 56.1%62.2%Ornith-1.0-397B leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%77.5%Ornith-1.0-397B leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 82.4%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 78.9%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource 48.2%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Ornith-1.0-397BResult
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source 87.7%Not comparable
CharXivSource 81%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 77.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1291Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, MiMo-V2.5 or Ornith-1.0-397B?

MiMo-V2.5 and Ornith-1.0-397B are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for coding, MiMo-V2.5 or Ornith-1.0-397B?

Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 74.6 versus 56.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, MiMo-V2.5 or Ornith-1.0-397B?

Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.5 versus 65.8. Inside this category, Claw-Eval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.