Model comparison
Ornith-1.0-397B vs Ornith-1.0-9B
Head-to-head evidence from 7 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Sibling matchup inside the Ornith 1.0 family.
Evidence parity. Ornith-1.0-397B and Ornith-1.0-9B share 7 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Ornith-1.0-397B; 0 to Ornith-1.0-9B.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 7
- Ornith-1.0-397B only
- 0
- Ornith-1.0-9B only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 2 / 8
Ornith-1.0-397B makes more sense if agentic is the priority, while Ornith-1.0-9B is the cleaner fit if its score, price, or context tradeoffs line up better with your workload.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 7 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Ornith-1.0-397B and Ornith-1.0-9B sit in the same Ornith 1.0 family. This page is less about two unrelated model lineages and more about how the siblings trade off on benchmark shape, token costs, and practical limits like context window.
Ornith-1.0-397B and Ornith-1.0-9B finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Ornith-1.0-397B | Δ | Ornith-1.0-9B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Ornith-1.0-397B77.5 | Margin← 34.4 | Ornith-1.0-9B43.1 |
| Coding | Ornith-1.0-397B74.6 | Margin← 15.4 | Ornith-1.0-9B59.2 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
Terminal-Bench 2.0
AgenticA 77.5%B 43.1%Winner: Ornith-1.0-397BΔ 34.4Terminal-Bench 2.0: Ornith-1.0-397B scored 77.5%; Ornith-1.0-9B scored 43.1%. Ornith-1.0-397B wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SWE-bench Pro
CodingA 62.2%B 42.9%Winner: Ornith-1.0-397BΔ 19.3SWE-bench Pro: Ornith-1.0-397B scored 62.2%; Ornith-1.0-9B scored 42.9%. Ornith-1.0-397B wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SWE-bench Verified
CodingA 82.4%B 69.4%Winner: Ornith-1.0-397BΔ 13SWE-bench Verified: Ornith-1.0-397B scored 82.4%; Ornith-1.0-9B scored 69.4%. Ornith-1.0-397B wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Ornith-1.0-397B | Ornith-1.0-9B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Ornith-1.0-397B$0 input / $0 output | Ornith-1.0-9B$0 input / $0 output | Listed prices are equal. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Ornith-1.0-397BNot available | Ornith-1.0-9BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Ornith-1.0-397BNot available | Ornith-1.0-9BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Ornith-1.0-397B256K | Ornith-1.0-9B256K | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
AgenticOrnith-1.0-397B wins2 benchmarks
CodingOrnith-1.0-397B wins5 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Ornith-1.0-397B | Ornith-1.0-9B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 82.4% | 69.4% | Ornith-1.0-397B leads |
| SWE-bench ProSource | 62.2% | 42.9% | Ornith-1.0-397B leads |
| SWE MultilingualSource | 78.9% | 52% | Ornith-1.0-397B leads |
| NL2RepoSource | 48.2% | 27.2% | Ornith-1.0-397B leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 77.5% | 43.1% | Ornith-1.0-397B leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Which is better, Ornith-1.0-397B or Ornith-1.0-9B?
Ornith-1.0-397B and Ornith-1.0-9B are sibling variants in the Ornith 1.0 family, so the right pick depends on whether you value the better benchmark line, cheaper tokens, or the larger context window. They are tied on the BenchAlign leaderboard on the current data.
Which is better for coding, Ornith-1.0-397B or Ornith-1.0-9B?
Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 74.6 versus 59.2. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Ornith-1.0-397B or Ornith-1.0-9B?
Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.5 versus 43.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.