Model comparison
LFM2.5-VL-450M vs Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct
Head-to-head evidence from 3 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Evidence parity. LFM2.5-VL-450M and Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct share 3 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to LFM2.5-VL-450M; 2 to Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 3
- LFM2.5-VL-450M only
- 4
- Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct only
- 2
- Comparable categories
- 2 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. LFM2.5-VL-450M makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct is the better fit if knowledge is the priority.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 3 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
LFM2.5-VL-450M and Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | LFM2.5-VL-450M | Δ | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | LFM2.5-VL-450M20.5 | Margin→ 20.4 | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct40.9 |
| Inst. Following | LFM2.5-VL-450M61.2 | Margin→ 14.6 | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct75.8 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
GPQA
KnowledgeA 25.7%B 40.9%Winner: Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructΔ 15.2GPQA: LFM2.5-VL-450M scored 25.7%; Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct scored 40.9%. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
IFEval
Inst. FollowingA 61.2%B 75.8%Winner: Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructΔ 14.6IFEval: LFM2.5-VL-450M scored 61.2%; Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct scored 75.8%. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | LFM2.5-VL-450M | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | LFM2.5-VL-450M$0 input / $0 output | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | LFM2.5-VL-450MNot available | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | LFM2.5-VL-450MNot available | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | LFM2.5-VL-450M128K | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct128K | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-VL-450M | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| BFCL v4Source | 21.1% | 44.2% | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct leads |
KnowledgeMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct wins4 benchmarks
Multimodal3 benchmarks
Inst. FollowingMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct wins1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | LFM2.5-VL-450M | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFEvalSource | 61.2% | 75.8% | Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Which is better, LFM2.5-VL-450M or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct?
LFM2.5-VL-450M and Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, LFM2.5-VL-450M or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct?
Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 40.9 versus 20.5. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for instruction following, LFM2.5-VL-450M or Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct?
Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 75.8 versus 61.2. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
- Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct vs Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Thinking
- Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct vs Claude Mythos 5
- Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct vs Claude Opus 4.8
- Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct vs GPT-5.4 Pro
- Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct vs Sakana Fugu-Ultra
- Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct vs GPT-5.6 Sol
- Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct vs Claude Fable 5
- Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct vs Claude Sonnet 5
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.