Skip to main content

Model comparison

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct vs Sakana Fugu-Ultra

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No comparison
N/A
0 category wins1 category wins

Evidence parity. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct and Sakana Fugu-Ultra share 2 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct; 9 to Sakana Fugu-Ultra.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
2
Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct only
3
Sakana Fugu-Ultra only
9
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct makes more sense if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model; Sakana Fugu-Ultra is the better fit if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct and Sakana Fugu-Ultra finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Sakana Fugu-Ultra is the reasoning model in the pair, while Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Sakana Fugu-Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct and Sakana Fugu-Ultra
CategoryMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructΔSakana Fugu-Ultra
KnowledgeMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct40.9Margin 54.6Sakana Fugu-Ultra95.5
AgenticMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot measuredMarginNo overlapSakana Fugu-Ultra82.1
CodingMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot measuredMarginNo overlapSakana Fugu-Ultra64.5
ReasoningMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot measuredMarginNo overlapSakana Fugu-Ultra93.6
MultimodalMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot measuredMarginNo overlapSakana Fugu-Ultra86.6
Inst. FollowingMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct75.8MarginNo overlapSakana Fugu-UltraNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructB · Sakana Fugu-Ultra
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 40.9%B 95.5%
    Winner: Sakana Fugu-UltraΔ 54.6
    GPQA: Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct scored 40.9%; Sakana Fugu-Ultra scored 95.5%. Sakana Fugu-Ultra wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructSakana Fugu-UltraComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot availableSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot availableSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructNot availableSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct128KSakana Fugu-Ultra1MSakana Fugu-Ultra lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructSakana Fugu-UltraResult
BFCL v4Source 44.2%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 82.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructSakana Fugu-UltraResult
SWE-bench ProSource 73.7%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 82.1%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source 93.2%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench ProSource 90.8%Not comparable
SciCodeSource 58.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructSakana Fugu-UltraResult
MRCRv2Source 93.6%Not comparable
KnowledgeSakana Fugu-Ultra wins
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructSakana Fugu-UltraResult
MMLU-ReduxSource 78.1%Not comparable
GPQASource 40.9%95.5%Sakana Fugu-Ultra leads
GPQA-DSource 40.9%95.5%Sakana Fugu-Ultra leads
HLE w/o toolsSource 50%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructSakana Fugu-UltraResult
CharXivSource 86.6%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMellum2-12B-A2.5B-InstructSakana Fugu-UltraResult
IFEvalSource 75.8%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?

Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct and Sakana Fugu-Ultra are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?

Sakana Fugu-Ultra has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 95.5 versus 40.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.