Model comparison
Interfaze Beta vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Head-to-head evidence from 3 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Interfaze Beta unranked (Not scored); Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B #151 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Interfaze Beta and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B share 3 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 7 results are unique to Interfaze Beta; 26 to Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 3
- Interfaze Beta only
- 7
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
- 26
- Comparable categories
- 2 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. Interfaze Beta makes more sense if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B is the better fit if multimodal & grounded is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 3 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Interfaze Beta and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Interfaze Beta is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.50 input / $3.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Interfaze Beta gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Interfaze Beta | Δ | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | Interfaze Beta89.9 | Margin← 13.6 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3 |
| Multimodal | Interfaze Beta71.1 | Margin→ 5.2 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3 |
| Coding | Interfaze BetaNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B32.0 |
| Inst. Following | Interfaze BetaNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B74.2 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
GPQA
KnowledgeA 89.9%B 72.2%Winner: Interfaze BetaΔ 17.7GPQA: Interfaze Beta scored 89.9%; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 72.2%. Interfaze Beta wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Interfaze Beta | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Interfaze Beta$1.5 input / $3.5 output | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B$0 input / $0 output | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Interfaze BetaNot available | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Interfaze BetaNot available | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Interfaze Beta1M | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B256K | Interfaze Beta lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic4 benchmarks
Coding4 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
KnowledgeInterfaze Beta wins10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Interfaze Beta | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 89.9% | 72.2% | Interfaze Beta leads |
| GPQA-DSource | 89.9% | 72.2% | Interfaze Beta leads |
| MMMLUSource | 90.9% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 77.3% | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 14.9% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 46.9% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 5.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -56.0% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 14.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 83.1% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Interfaze Beta | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025Source | — | 82.1% | Not comparable |
MultimodalNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B wins12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Interfaze Beta | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCRBench V2Source | 70.7% | — | Not comparable |
| olmOCRSource | 85.7% | — | Not comparable |
| RefCOCO (avg)Source | 82.1% | 90.5% | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads |
| VoxPopuli WERSource | 2.4% | — | Not comparable |
| MMMU-ProSource | 71.1% | — | Not comparable |
| MMMUSource | — | 70.8% | Not comparable |
| MMLongBench-DocSource | — | 57.5% | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | — | 76.3% | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | — | 57.8% | Not comparable |
| Video-MME (w/o subtitle)Source | — | 72.2% | Not comparable |
| AI2D_TESTSource | — | 88.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | — | 53.2% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Which is better, Interfaze Beta or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
Interfaze Beta and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Interfaze Beta or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
Interfaze Beta has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 89.9 versus 76.3. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Interfaze Beta or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.3 versus 71.1. Inside this category, RefCOCO (avg) is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.