Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Interfaze Beta vs Sakana Fugu-Ultra

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

N/A
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins2 category wins

Evidence parity. Interfaze Beta and Sakana Fugu-Ultra share 2 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 8 results are unique to Interfaze Beta; 9 to Sakana Fugu-Ultra.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
2
Interfaze Beta only
8
Sakana Fugu-Ultra only
9
Comparable categories
2 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Interfaze Beta makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; Sakana Fugu-Ultra is the better fit if multimodal & grounded is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Interfaze Beta and Sakana Fugu-Ultra finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Interfaze Beta and Sakana Fugu-Ultra
CategoryInterfaze BetaΔSakana Fugu-Ultra
MultimodalInterfaze Beta71.1Margin→ 15.5Sakana Fugu-Ultra86.6
KnowledgeInterfaze Beta89.9Margin→ 5.6Sakana Fugu-Ultra95.5
AgenticInterfaze BetaNot measuredMarginNo overlapSakana Fugu-Ultra82.1
CodingInterfaze BetaNot measuredMarginNo overlapSakana Fugu-Ultra64.5
ReasoningInterfaze BetaNot measuredMarginNo overlapSakana Fugu-Ultra93.6

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Interfaze BetaB · Sakana Fugu-Ultra

  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 89.9%B 95.5%
    Winner: Sakana Fugu-UltraΔ 5.6
    GPQA: Interfaze Beta scored 89.9%; Sakana Fugu-Ultra scored 95.5%. Sakana Fugu-Ultra wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricInterfaze BetaSakana Fugu-UltraComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensInterfaze Beta$1.5 input / $3.5 outputSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondInterfaze BetaNot availableSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenInterfaze BetaNot availableSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensInterfaze Beta1MSakana Fugu-Ultra1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkInterfaze BetaSakana Fugu-UltraResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —82.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkInterfaze BetaSakana Fugu-UltraResult
Spider 2.0-LiteSource 52.9%—Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource —73.7%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —82.1%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source —93.2%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench ProSource —90.8%Not comparable
SciCodeSource —58.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkInterfaze BetaSakana Fugu-UltraResult
MRCRv2Source —93.6%Not comparable
KnowledgeSakana Fugu-Ultra wins
BenchmarkInterfaze BetaSakana Fugu-UltraResult
GPQASource 89.9%95.5%Sakana Fugu-Ultra leads
GPQA-DSource 89.9%95.5%Sakana Fugu-Ultra leads
MMMLUSource 90.9%—Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource —50%Not comparable
MultimodalSakana Fugu-Ultra wins
BenchmarkInterfaze BetaSakana Fugu-UltraResult
OCRBench V2Source 70.7%—Not comparable
olmOCRSource 85.7%—Not comparable
RefCOCO (avg)Source 82.1%—Not comparable
VoxPopuli WERSource 2.4%—Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 71.1%—Not comparable
CharXivSource —86.6%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkInterfaze BetaSakana Fugu-UltraResult
SOB Value AccSource 79.5%—Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Interfaze Beta or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?

Interfaze Beta and Sakana Fugu-Ultra are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Interfaze Beta or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?

Sakana Fugu-Ultra has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 95.5 versus 89.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Interfaze Beta or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?

Sakana Fugu-Ultra has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 86.6 versus 71.1. Interfaze Beta stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Interfaze Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.