Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Hy3 Preview vs Qwen3.7 Max

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 22 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

N/A
No comparison
72.84/100
0 category wins4 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Hy3 Preview unranked (Not scored); Qwen3.7 Max #10 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Hy3 Preview and Qwen3.7 Max share 22 comparable benchmark results. 4 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Hy3 Preview; 36 to Qwen3.7 Max.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
22
Hy3 Preview only
0
Qwen3.7 Max only
36
Comparable categories
4 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Hy3 Preview makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; Qwen3.7 Max is the better fit if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 22 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 4 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Hy3 Preview and Qwen3.7 Max finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Qwen3.7 Max gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Hy3 Preview.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Hy3 Preview and Qwen3.7 Max
CategoryHy3 PreviewΔQwen3.7 Max
KnowledgeHy3 Preview33.8Margin→ 30.4Qwen3.7 Max64.2
Inst. FollowingHy3 Preview63.1Margin→ 21.3Qwen3.7 Max84.4
CodingHy3 Preview57.8Margin→ 20.1Qwen3.7 Max77.9
AgenticHy3 Preview54.4Margin→ 15.3Qwen3.7 Max69.7
ReasoningHy3 PreviewNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max90.4
MathHy3 PreviewNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max97.1
MultilingualHy3 PreviewNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max87.0

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Hy3 PreviewB · Qwen3.7 Max

  1. IFBench

    Inst. Following
    Source ↗
    A 63.1%B 79.1%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 16
    IFBench: Hy3 Preview scored 63.1%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 79.1%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

  2. HLE

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 25.5%B 41.4%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 15.9
    HLE: Hy3 Preview scored 25.5%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 41.4%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

  3. Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 54.4%B 69.7%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 15.3
    Terminal-Bench 2.0: Hy3 Preview scored 54.4%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 69.7%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

  4. SciCode

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 41.2%B 53.5%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 12.3
    SciCode: Hy3 Preview scored 41.2%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 53.5%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

  5. SWE-bench Verified

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 74.4%B 80.4%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 MaxΔ 6
    SWE-bench Verified: Hy3 Preview scored 74.4%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 80.4%. Qwen3.7 Max wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricHy3 PreviewQwen3.7 MaxComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensHy3 Preview$0 input / $0 outputQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondHy3 PreviewNot availableQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenHy3 PreviewNot availableQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensHy3 Preview256KQwen3.7 Max1MQwen3.7 Max lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewQwen3.7 MaxResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 54.4%69.7%Qwen3.7 Max leads
Gert LabsSource 36.91%64.27%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 30.7%30.6%Hy3 Preview leads
GDPval-AASource 35.7%38.7%Qwen3.7 Max leads
GDPval-AASource 12141273Qwen3.7 Max leads
QwenClawBenchSource —64.3%Not comparable
QwenWebBenchSource —1568Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource —65.2%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source —75.0%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource —76.4%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource —47.9%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource —53.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource —94.7%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource —18.7%Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource —908Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource —25.6%Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource —45.0%Not comparable
AA ITBenchSource —42.5%Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource —50.8%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source —74.5%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource —83.4%Not comparable
CodingQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewQwen3.7 MaxResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 74.4%80.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 54.4%69.7%Qwen3.7 Max leads
SciCodeSource 41.2%53.5%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-SciCodeSource 47.6%48.8%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA Coding IndexSource 58.8%66.0%Qwen3.7 Max leads
SWE-bench ProSource —60.6%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource —78.3%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource —47.2%Not comparable
LiveCodeBenchSource —91.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewQwen3.7 MaxResult
AA-LCRSource 66.7%69.0%Qwen3.7 Max leads
CritPtSource 4.9%13.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
MRCRv2Source —90.4%Not comparable
KnowledgeQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewQwen3.7 MaxResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 41.2%46.0%Qwen3.7 Max leads
GPQASource 87.2%92.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
GPQA-DSource 87.2%92.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
HLESource 25.5%41.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 31.5%30.1%Hy3 Preview leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 73.0%22.9%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 89.7%92.3%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-HLESource 31.6%38.1%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -18.5%14.1%Qwen3.7 Max leads
MMLU-ProSource —89.6%Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource —95%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource —73.6%Not comparable
MMMLUSource —90.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewQwen3.7 MaxResult
HMMT Feb 2026Source —97.1%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource —90.0%Not comparable
ApexSource —44.5%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewQwen3.7 MaxResult
MMLU-ProXSource —87%Not comparable
NOVA-63Source —59.0%Not comparable
INCLUDESource —86.2%Not comparable
MAXIFESource —89.2%Not comparable
PolyMathSource —86.5%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewQwen3.7 MaxResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1293Not comparable
Inst. FollowingQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewQwen3.7 MaxResult
IFBenchSource 63.1%79.1%Qwen3.7 Max leads
IFEvalSource —94.3%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource —80.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, Hy3 Preview or Qwen3.7 Max?

Hy3 Preview and Qwen3.7 Max are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Hy3 Preview or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 64.2 versus 33.8. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Hy3 Preview or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 77.9 versus 57.8. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Hy3 Preview or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 69.7 versus 54.4. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Hy3 Preview or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 84.4 versus 63.1. Inside this category, IFBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Tencent Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.