Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
GPT-5.5
91
Qwen3.7 Max
91
Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-5.5 #5 · Qwen3.7 Max #2
Treat this as a split decision. GPT-5.5 makes more sense if agentic is the priority; Qwen3.7 Max is the better fit if coding is the priority.
Agentic
+11.8 difference
Coding
+15.0 difference
Reasoning
+5.4 difference
Knowledge
+4.8 difference
GPT-5.5
Qwen3.7 Max
$5 / $30
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
1M
Treat this as a split decision. GPT-5.5 makes more sense if agentic is the priority; Qwen3.7 Max is the better fit if coding is the priority.
GPT-5.5 and Qwen3.7 Max finish on the same provisional overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The provisional headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
GPT-5.5 and Qwen3.7 Max are tied on the provisional overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.2 versus 66.4. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 73.6 versus 58.6. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 90.4 versus 85. Inside this category, CritPt is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.5 versus 69.7. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.