Model comparison
GPT-4.1 nano vs Nemotron 3 Ultra
Head-to-head evidence from 17 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4.1 nano #161 (Estimated); Nemotron 3 Ultra unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. GPT-4.1 nano and Nemotron 3 Ultra share 17 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to GPT-4.1 nano; 21 to Nemotron 3 Ultra.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 17
- GPT-4.1 nano only
- 4
- Nemotron 3 Ultra only
- 21
- Comparable categories
- 2 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. GPT-4.1 nano makes more sense if instruction following is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model; Nemotron 3 Ultra is the better fit if knowledge is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 17 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
GPT-4.1 nano and Nemotron 3 Ultra finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
GPT-4.1 nano is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Ultra. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Nemotron 3 Ultra is the reasoning model in the pair, while GPT-4.1 nano is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | GPT-4.1 nano | Δ | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | GPT-4.1 nano50.3 | Margin→ 3.5 | Nemotron 3 Ultra53.8 |
| Inst. Following | GPT-4.1 nano83.2 | Margin← 1.5 | Nemotron 3 Ultra81.7 |
| Agentic | GPT-4.1 nanoNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra51.3 |
| Coding | GPT-4.1 nanoNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra58.3 |
| Reasoning | GPT-4.1 nanoNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra61.9 |
| Math | GPT-4.1 nano1.0 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 UltraNot measured |
| Multilingual | GPT-4.1 nanoNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra83.0 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
GPQA
KnowledgeA 50.3%B 87%Winner: Nemotron 3 UltraΔ 36.7GPQA: GPT-4.1 nano scored 50.3%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 87%. Nemotron 3 Ultra wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | GPT-4.1 nano | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | GPT-4.1 nano$0.1 input / $0.4 output | Nemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 output | Nemotron 3 Ultra has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | GPT-4.1 nano181 tok/s | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | GPT-4.1 nano0.63 s | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | GPT-4.1 nano1M | Nemotron 3 Ultra1M | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 1.2% | 27.4% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 17.3% | 83.3% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 0.0% | 33.2% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 41 | 1164 | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
| PinchBenchSource | — | 90.0% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 44.4% | Not comparable |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | — | 70.9% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | — | 37.4% | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 870 | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | — | 28.9% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 81.7% | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | — | 36.4% | Not comparable |
Coding6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding IndexSource | 11.1% | 49.3% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 25.9% | 39.9% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 71.9% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 67.7% | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | — | 44.6% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 56.4% | Not comparable |
Reasoning3 benchmarks
KnowledgeNemotron 3 Ultra wins13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLUSource | 80.1% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | 50.3% | 87% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 9.6% | 37.8% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 51.2% | 86.7% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-HLESource | 3.9% | 26.6% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -56.4% | -0.8% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 13.3% | 21.6% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 80.4% | 28.5% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 87.0% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 86.8% | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | — | 83.3% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source | 1.034% | — | Not comparable |
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProXSource | — | 83% | Not comparable |
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Which is better, GPT-4.1 nano or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
GPT-4.1 nano and Nemotron 3 Ultra are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-4.1 nano or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
Nemotron 3 Ultra has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 53.8 versus 50.3. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for instruction following, GPT-4.1 nano or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
GPT-4.1 nano has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 83.2 versus 81.7. Inside this category, AA-IFBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.