Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Sakana Fugu-Ultra
Head-to-head evidence from 6 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Nemotron 3 Ultra and Sakana Fugu-Ultra share 6 comparable benchmark results. 4 of 8 categories are comparable. 32 results are unique to Nemotron 3 Ultra; 5 to Sakana Fugu-Ultra.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 6
- Nemotron 3 Ultra only
- 32
- Sakana Fugu-Ultra only
- 5
- Comparable categories
- 4 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. Nemotron 3 Ultra makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; Sakana Fugu-Ultra is the better fit if knowledge is the priority.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 6 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 4 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Nemotron 3 Ultra and Sakana Fugu-Ultra finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Δ | Sakana Fugu-Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | Nemotron 3 Ultra53.8 | Margin→ 41.7 | Sakana Fugu-Ultra95.5 |
| Reasoning | Nemotron 3 Ultra61.9 | Margin→ 31.7 | Sakana Fugu-Ultra93.6 |
| Agentic | Nemotron 3 Ultra51.3 | Margin→ 30.8 | Sakana Fugu-Ultra82.1 |
| Coding | Nemotron 3 Ultra58.3 | Margin→ 6.2 | Sakana Fugu-Ultra64.5 |
| Multilingual | Nemotron 3 Ultra83.0 | MarginNo overlap | Sakana Fugu-UltraNot measured |
| Multimodal | Nemotron 3 UltraNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Sakana Fugu-Ultra86.6 |
| Inst. Following | Nemotron 3 Ultra81.7 | MarginNo overlap | Sakana Fugu-UltraNot measured |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
Terminal-Bench 2.0
AgenticA 56.4%B 82.1%Winner: Sakana Fugu-UltraΔ 25.7Terminal-Bench 2.0: Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 56.4%; Sakana Fugu-Ultra scored 82.1%. Sakana Fugu-Ultra wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
SciCode
CodingA 44.6%B 58.7%Winner: Sakana Fugu-UltraΔ 14.1SciCode: Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 44.6%; Sakana Fugu-Ultra scored 58.7%. Sakana Fugu-Ultra wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
GPQA
KnowledgeA 87%B 95.5%Winner: Sakana Fugu-UltraΔ 8.5GPQA: Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 87%; Sakana Fugu-Ultra scored 95.5%. Sakana Fugu-Ultra wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Sakana Fugu-Ultra | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Nemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 output | Sakana Fugu-UltraNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | Sakana Fugu-UltraNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | Sakana Fugu-UltraNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Nemotron 3 Ultra1M | Sakana Fugu-Ultra1M | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
AgenticSakana Fugu-Ultra wins13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Sakana Fugu-Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 56.4% | 82.1% | Sakana Fugu-Ultra leads |
| PinchBenchSource | 90.0% | — | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | 44.4% | — | Not comparable |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | 70.9% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 33.2% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | 37.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 27.4% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 83.3% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1164 | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 870 | — | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | 28.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | 81.7% | — | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | 36.4% | — | Not comparable |
CodingSakana Fugu-Ultra wins9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Sakana Fugu-Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 71.9% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | 67.7% | — | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | 44.6% | 58.7% | Sakana Fugu-Ultra leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 56.4% | 82.1% | Sakana Fugu-Ultra leads |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 49.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 39.9% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 73.7% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench v6Source | — | 93.2% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench ProSource | — | 90.8% | Not comparable |
ReasoningSakana Fugu-Ultra wins4 benchmarks
KnowledgeSakana Fugu-Ultra wins12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Sakana Fugu-Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 87% | 95.5% | Sakana Fugu-Ultra leads |
| GPQA-DSource | 87.0% | 95.5% | Sakana Fugu-Ultra leads |
| HLESource | 26.7% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | 26.7% | 50% | Sakana Fugu-Ultra leads |
| MMLU-ProSource | 86.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 21.6% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 37.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 86.7% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 26.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -0.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 28.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | 83.3% | — | Not comparable |
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Sakana Fugu-Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProXSource | 83% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (5)
Which is better, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?
Nemotron 3 Ultra and Sakana Fugu-Ultra are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?
Sakana Fugu-Ultra has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 95.5 versus 53.8. Inside this category, HLE w/o tools is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?
Sakana Fugu-Ultra has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 64.5 versus 58.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for reasoning, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?
Sakana Fugu-Ultra has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 93.6 versus 61.9. Nemotron 3 Ultra stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?
Sakana Fugu-Ultra has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 82.1 versus 51.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.