Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

GLM-4.7 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 22 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

61.16/100
No comparison
N/A
1 category wins2 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GLM-4.7 #42 (Supported); Nemotron 3 Ultra unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GLM-4.7 and Nemotron 3 Ultra share 22 comparable benchmark results. 3 of 8 categories are comparable. 8 results are unique to GLM-4.7; 16 to Nemotron 3 Ultra.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
22
GLM-4.7 only
8
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
16
Comparable categories
3 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. GLM-4.7 makes more sense if coding is the priority; Nemotron 3 Ultra is the better fit if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 22 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 3 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

GLM-4.7 and Nemotron 3 Ultra finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Nemotron 3 Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GLM-4.7 and Nemotron 3 Ultra
CategoryGLM-4.7ΔNemotron 3 Ultra
CodingGLM-4.775.4Margin← 17.1Nemotron 3 Ultra58.3
AgenticGLM-4.745.7Margin→ 5.6Nemotron 3 Ultra51.3
KnowledgeGLM-4.751.8Margin→ 2.0Nemotron 3 Ultra53.8
ReasoningGLM-4.7Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra61.9
MathGLM-4.71.8MarginNo overlapNemotron 3 UltraNot measured
MultilingualGLM-4.7Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra83.0
Inst. FollowingGLM-4.7Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Ultra81.7

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · GLM-4.7B · Nemotron 3 Ultra

  1. Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 41%B 56.4%
    Winner: Nemotron 3 UltraΔ 15.4
    Terminal-Bench 2.0: GLM-4.7 scored 41%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 56.4%. Nemotron 3 Ultra wins this benchmark.

  2. BrowseComp

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 52%B 44.4%
    Winner: GLM-4.7Δ 7.6
    BrowseComp: GLM-4.7 scored 52%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 44.4%. GLM-4.7 wins this benchmark.

  3. MMLU-Pro

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 84.3%B 86.8%
    Winner: Nemotron 3 UltraΔ 2.5
    MMLU-Pro: GLM-4.7 scored 84.3%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 86.8%. Nemotron 3 Ultra wins this benchmark.

  4. HLE

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 24.8%B 26.7%
    Winner: Nemotron 3 UltraΔ 1.9
    HLE: GLM-4.7 scored 24.8%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 26.7%. Nemotron 3 Ultra wins this benchmark.

  5. SWE-bench Verified

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 73.8%B 71.9%
    Winner: GLM-4.7Δ 1.9
    SWE-bench Verified: GLM-4.7 scored 73.8%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 71.9%. GLM-4.7 wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGLM-4.7Nemotron 3 UltraComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGLM-4.7$0 input / $0 outputNemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondGLM-4.782 tok/sNemotron 3 UltraNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGLM-4.71.10 sNemotron 3 UltraNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGLM-4.7200KNemotron 3 Ultra1MNemotron 3 Ultra lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticNemotron 3 Ultra wins
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Nemotron 3 UltraResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 41%56.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
BrowseCompSource 52%44.4%GLM-4.7 leads
VITA-BenchSource 15.5%—Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 25.4%27.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 95.9%83.3%GLM-4.7 leads
Gert LabsSource 39.95%—Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 33.3%33.2%GLM-4.7 leads
GDPval-AASource 11651164GLM-4.7 leads
PinchBenchSource —90.0%Not comparable
τ³-bench resultsSource —70.9%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource —37.4%Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource —870Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource —28.9%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource —81.7%Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource —36.4%Not comparable
CodingGLM-4.7 wins
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Nemotron 3 UltraResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.8%71.9%GLM-4.7 leads
LiveCodeBenchSource 84.9%—Not comparable
SWE-RebenchSource 58.7%—Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 45.3%49.3%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-SciCodeSource 45.1%39.9%GLM-4.7 leads
AA LiveCodeBenchSource 89.4%—Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource —67.7%Not comparable
SciCodeSource —44.6%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —56.4%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Nemotron 3 UltraResult
AA-LCRSource 64.0%67.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
CritPtSource 1.7%3.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
LongBench v2Source —61.9%Not comparable
KnowledgeNemotron 3 Ultra wins
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Nemotron 3 UltraResult
GPQASource 85.7%87%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
MMLU-ProSource 84.3%86.8%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
HLESource 24.8%26.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 33.7%37.8%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 85.9%86.7%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-HLESource 25.1%26.6%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -34.6%-0.8%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 29.3%21.6%GLM-4.7 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 90.3%28.5%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
GPQA-DSource —87.0%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource —26.7%Not comparable
AA Openness IndexSource —83.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Nemotron 3 UltraResult
AIME 2025Source 95.7%—Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 2.439%—Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%—Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Nemotron 3 UltraResult
MMLU-ProXSource —83%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Nemotron 3 UltraResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 12551129GLM-4.7 leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGLM-4.7Nemotron 3 UltraResult
AA-IFBenchSource 67.9%81.4%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
IFBenchSource —81.7%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, GLM-4.7 or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

GLM-4.7 and Nemotron 3 Ultra are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GLM-4.7 or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Nemotron 3 Ultra has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 53.8 versus 51.8. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7 or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

GLM-4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 75.4 versus 58.3. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GLM-4.7 or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

Nemotron 3 Ultra has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 51.3 versus 45.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Z.AI Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.