Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Gemini 3 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Max

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

67.73/100
Margin
5.1pts
winning →
72.84/100
0 category wins2 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Gemini 3 Pro #19 (Supported); Qwen3.7 Max #10 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Gemini 3 Pro and Qwen3.7 Max share 12 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 15 results are unique to Gemini 3 Pro; 46 to Qwen3.7 Max.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
12
Gemini 3 Pro only
15
Qwen3.7 Max only
46
Comparable categories
2 / 8

Pick Qwen3.7 Max if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Gemini 3 Pro only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 2M context window or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Qwen3.7 Max is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 72.84 to 67.73. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3.7 Max's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 97.1 against 32.9.

Qwen3.7 Max is the reasoning model in the pair, while Gemini 3 Pro is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Gemini 3 Pro gives you the larger context window at 2M, compared with 1M for Qwen3.7 Max.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Gemini 3 Pro and Qwen3.7 Max
CategoryGemini 3 ProΔQwen3.7 Max
MathGemini 3 Pro32.9Margin→ 64.2Qwen3.7 Max97.1
ReasoningGemini 3 Pro31.1Margin→ 59.3Qwen3.7 Max90.4
AgenticGemini 3 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max69.7
CodingGemini 3 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max77.9
KnowledgeGemini 3 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max64.2
MultilingualGemini 3 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max87.0
MultimodalGemini 3 Pro81.1MarginNo overlapQwen3.7 MaxNot measured
Inst. FollowingGemini 3 ProNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max84.4

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGemini 3 ProQwen3.7 MaxComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGemini 3 Pro$2 input / $12 outputQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGemini 3 Pro109 tok/sQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGemini 3 Pro32.65 sQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGemini 3 Pro2MQwen3.7 Max1MGemini 3 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProQwen3.7 MaxResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 87.1%94.7%Qwen3.7 Max leads
Gert LabsSource 63.23%64.27%Qwen3.7 Max leads
JobBenchSource 11.4%—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —69.7%Not comparable
QwenClawBenchSource —64.3%Not comparable
QwenWebBenchSource —1568Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource —65.2%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source —75.0%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource —76.4%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource —47.9%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource —53.5%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource —30.6%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —38.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —1273Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource —18.7%Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource —908Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource —25.6%Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource —45.0%Not comparable
AA ITBenchSource —42.5%Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource —50.8%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source —74.5%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource —83.4%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProQwen3.7 MaxResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 14.30%—Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 56.1%48.8%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA LiveCodeBenchSource 91.7%—Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource —80.4%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource —60.6%Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource —78.3%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource —47.2%Not comparable
SciCodeSource —53.5%Not comparable
LiveCodeBenchSource —91.6%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —69.7%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource —66.0%Not comparable
ReasoningQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProQwen3.7 MaxResult
ARC-AGI-2Source 31.1%—Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 70.7%69.0%Gemini 3 Pro leads
CritPtSource 9.1%13.4%Qwen3.7 Max leads
MRCRv2Source —90.4%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProQwen3.7 MaxResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 39.5%46.0%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 90.8%92.3%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-HLESource 37.2%38.1%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 15.8%14.1%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 55.9%30.1%Gemini 3 Pro leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 90.9%22.9%Qwen3.7 Max leads
AA MMLU-ProSource 89.8%—Not comparable
GPQASource —92.4%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource —92.4%Not comparable
HLESource —41.4%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource —89.6%Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource —95%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource —73.6%Not comparable
MMMLUSource —90.3%Not comparable
MathQwen3.7 Max wins
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProQwen3.7 MaxResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 37.600%—Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 18.750%—Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source —97.1%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource —90.0%Not comparable
ApexSource —44.5%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProQwen3.7 MaxResult
AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource 92.2%—Not comparable
MMLU-ProXSource —87%Not comparable
NOVA-63Source —59.0%Not comparable
INCLUDESource —86.2%Not comparable
MAXIFESource —89.2%Not comparable
PolyMathSource —86.5%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProQwen3.7 MaxResult
MMMU-ProSource 81%—Not comparable
MathVisionSource 86.6%—Not comparable
VideoMMMUSource 87.6%—Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource 72.7%—Not comparable
CharXivSource 81.4%—Not comparable
V*Source 88.0%—Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 80.2%—Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1293Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGemini 3 ProQwen3.7 MaxResult
AA-IFBenchSource 70.4%80.5%Qwen3.7 Max leads
IFEvalSource —94.3%Not comparable
IFBenchSource —79.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 72.84 to 67.73.

Which is better for math, Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 97.1 versus 32.9. Gemini 3 Pro stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for reasoning, Gemini 3 Pro or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 90.4 versus 31.1. Inside this category, CritPt is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Google Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.