Skip to main content

Model profile

Grok Build 0.1

xAICurrentReleased May 20, 2026
Data verified
Overall Score
Unranked
Arena Elo
Not listed
Eligible category ranks
1of 8
Price (1M tokens)
$1 in / $2 out
API pricing
Speed
Not listed
Context
256K

Evidence coverage

1 of 323 tracked benchmarks is published. 1 is verified and 0 provisional. 1 of 8 categories are measured.

Updated July 23, 2026Methodology
Published / tracked
1 / 323
Verified
1
Provisional
0
Categories with evidence
1 / 8

Evidence by category

  • Agentic1 benchmark
    Verified
  • Coding0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Reasoning0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Knowledge0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Math0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Multilingual0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Multimodal0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Inst. Following0 benchmarks
    Not measured
ProprietaryNon-Reasoning
Confidence:
Low
base

BenchLM is tracking Grok Build 0.1, but this profile is currently excluded from the public leaderboard because it still lacks enough non-generated benchmark coverage to rank safely. Only non-generated public benchmark rows appear below.

Grok Build 0.1 is a proprietary model with a 256K token context window. It processes queries without explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, offering faster response times and lower token usage.

This profile currently has 1 of 323 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

Its strongest category is Agentic (#113). This performance profile makes it particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.

Peer position

Exact provisional scores and ranks for the closest listed peers. A score can appear before a model clears the evidence threshold for a rank, so equal scores can have different rank states.

Range 77.4483.93

  1. Claude Mythos 5
    Anthropic
    #183.93
    Claude Mythos 5 is #1 with a score of 83.93.
    Compare
  2. Claude Fable 5
    Anthropic
    #283.68
    Claude Fable 5 is #2 with a score of 83.68.
    Compare
  3. GPT-5.6 Sol
    OpenAI
    #381.96
    GPT-5.6 Sol is #3 with a score of 81.96.
    Compare
  4. Kimi K3
    Moonshot AI
    #480.96
    Kimi K3 is #4 with a score of 80.96.
    Compare
  5. Claude Opus 4.8
    Anthropic
    #578.34
    Claude Opus 4.8 is #5 with a score of 78.34.
    Compare
  6. Muse Spark 1.1
    Meta
    #677.44
    Muse Spark 1.1 is #6 with a score of 77.44.
    Compare
  7. Grok Build 0.1Current model
    xAI
    UnrankedNot measured
    Grok Build 0.1 is Unranked with a score of Not measured.

Category percentile

More

Relative position among models eligible for each sourced category. A higher percentile means a stronger position within that category's ranked cohort; 100 is highest.

  1. Agentic5%
    Eligible cohort rank #113 of 119Category score 28.6

Category evidence

Scores and ranks appear only where this model has published benchmark evidence. Categories without displayable source records remain not measured.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticRank #113 of 119Percentile 5thWeight 22%1 benchmarkVerified28.6
CodingWeight 20%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured

Benchmark Details

Rows below have a displayable published verification record. Each source link and provenance note remains in the page HTML while its category is closed. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows stay hidden.

Agentic1 benchmark
Gert LabsBenchmark exact

Gert Labs Composite Game Benchmark

49.15%Display only
Source: Gert Labs rankingsProvenance: Gert Labs reports this composite leaderboard score in the public rankings API. BenchLM scales the source gscore from 0-1 to 0-100 and stores it as a display-only agentic benchmark.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Grok Build 0.1 perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Grok Build 0.1 has 1 published benchmark scores on BenchLM, but it does not yet have enough non-generated coverage to receive a global overall rank.

Is Grok Build 0.1 good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?

Grok Build 0.1 ranks #113 out of 119 models in agentic tool use and computer tasks benchmarks with an average score of 28.6. There are stronger options in this category.

Does Grok Build 0.1 have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

Not yet. Grok Build 0.1 currently has 1 published benchmark scores out of the 323 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

What is the context window size of Grok Build 0.1?

Grok Build 0.1 has a published context window of 256K, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.

Last updated: July 23, 2026 · Runtime metrics stay blank until BenchLM has a sourced snapshot.

Choose with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, new releases, pricing changes, and the evidence behind them.

Free. One email per week.