Skip to main content

Model profile

Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking

AnthropicEstablishedReleased Oct 15, 2025
Data verified
Overall Score
Unranked
Arena Elo
Not listed
Eligible category ranks
0of 8
Price (1M tokens)
Not listedAPI pricing
Speed
Not listed
Context
200K

Evidence coverage

2 of 323 tracked benchmarks are published. 1 is verified and 1 provisional. 2 of 8 categories are measured.

Updated July 23, 2026Methodology
Published / tracked
2 / 323
Verified
1
Provisional
1
Categories with evidence
2 / 8

Evidence by category

  • Agentic0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Coding1 benchmark
    Verified
  • Reasoning0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Knowledge0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Math0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Multilingual0 benchmarks
    Not measured
  • Multimodal1 benchmark
    Reported
  • Inst. Following0 benchmarks
    Not measured
ProprietaryReasoning
Confidence:
Low
reasoning

BenchLM is tracking Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking, but this profile is currently excluded from the public leaderboard because it still lacks enough non-generated benchmark coverage to rank safely. Only non-generated public benchmark rows appear below.

Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking is a proprietary model with a 200K token context window. It uses explicit chain-of-thought reasoning, which typically improves performance on math and complex reasoning tasks at the cost of higher latency and token usage.

Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking sits inside the Claude Haiku 4.5 family alongside Claude Haiku 4.5. This profile currently has 2 of 323 tracked benchmarks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated benchmark rows publicly, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

Peer position

Exact provisional scores and ranks for the closest listed peers. A score can appear before a model clears the evidence threshold for a rank, so equal scores can have different rank states.

Range 77.4483.93

  1. Claude Mythos 5
    Anthropic
    #183.93
    Claude Mythos 5 is #1 with a score of 83.93.
    Compare
  2. Claude Fable 5
    Anthropic
    #283.68
    Claude Fable 5 is #2 with a score of 83.68.
    Compare
  3. GPT-5.6 Sol
    OpenAI
    #381.96
    GPT-5.6 Sol is #3 with a score of 81.96.
    Compare
  4. Kimi K3
    Moonshot AI
    #480.96
    Kimi K3 is #4 with a score of 80.96.
    Compare
  5. Claude Opus 4.8
    Anthropic
    #578.34
    Claude Opus 4.8 is #5 with a score of 78.34.
    Compare
  6. Muse Spark 1.1
    Meta
    #677.44
    Muse Spark 1.1 is #6 with a score of 77.44.
    Compare
  7. Claude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingCurrent model
    Anthropic
    UnrankedNot measured
    Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking is Unranked with a score of Not measured.

Category percentile

More

Relative position among models eligible for each sourced category. A higher percentile means a stronger position within that category's ranked cohort; 100 is highest.

No eligible category percentile is available from the published evidence yet.

Category evidence

Scores and ranks appear only where this model has published benchmark evidence. Categories without displayable source records remain not measured.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticWeight 22%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
CodingWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerifiedScore pending
ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultimodalWeight 12%1 benchmarkReportedScore pending
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured

Benchmark Details

Rows below have a displayable published verification record. Each source link and provenance note remains in the page HTML while its category is closed. Source-unverified manual rows and generated rows stay hidden.

Coding1 benchmark
Vibe Code BenchBenchmark exact

Vibe Code Bench v1.1

11.39%Display only
Source: Vals AI: Vibe Code Bench v1.1Provenance: Vals Vibe Code Bench v1.1 reports this exact row under anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5-20251001-thinking; BenchLM stores it on the local vibeCodeBench key.
Multimodal1 benchmark
Design Arena WebsiteReported

Design Arena Website Elo

1152Display only
Source: OpenRouter model benchmarksProvenance: Display-only Design Arena Website Elo synced from OpenRouter model benchmark metadata. It is excluded from BenchLM weighted scoring.

Claude Haiku 4.5 Family

reasoning · thinking

Canonical Entry

Claude Haiku 4.5

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking has 2 published benchmark scores on BenchLM, but it does not yet have enough non-generated coverage to receive a global overall rank.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking good for coding and programming?

Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking has visible benchmark coverage in coding and programming, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking good for multimodal and grounded tasks?

Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking has visible benchmark coverage in multimodal and grounded tasks, but BenchLM does not currently assign it a global category rank there.

Which sibling models are related to Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking?

Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking belongs to the Claude Haiku 4.5 family. Related variants on BenchLM include Claude Haiku 4.5.

Does Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

Not yet. Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking currently has 2 published benchmark scores out of the 323 benchmarks BenchLM tracks. BenchLM only exposes non-generated public benchmark rows, so missing categories stay blank until a sourced evaluation is available.

What is the context window size of Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking?

Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking has a published context window of 200K, which determines how much text it can process in a single interaction.

Last updated: July 23, 2026 · Runtime metrics stay blank until BenchLM has a sourced snapshot.

Choose with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, new releases, pricing changes, and the evidence behind them.

Free. One email per week.