Skip to main content

Model comparison

Qwen3.5 Flash vs Sakana Fugu-Ultra

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
47.65/100
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Qwen3.5 Flash #134 (Supported); Sakana Fugu-Ultra unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Qwen3.5 Flash and Sakana Fugu-Ultra share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to Qwen3.5 Flash; 11 to Sakana Fugu-Ultra.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
Qwen3.5 Flash only
2
Sakana Fugu-Ultra only
11
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Qwen3.5 Flash and Sakana Fugu-Ultra is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricQwen3.5 FlashSakana Fugu-UltraComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensQwen3.5 Flash$0.1 input / $0.4 outputSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondQwen3.5 FlashNot availableSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenQwen3.5 FlashNot availableSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensQwen3.5 Flash1MSakana Fugu-Ultra1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkQwen3.5 FlashSakana Fugu-UltraResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 82.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkQwen3.5 FlashSakana Fugu-UltraResult
SWE-bench ProSource 73.7%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 82.1%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source 93.2%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench ProSource 90.8%Not comparable
SciCodeSource 58.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkQwen3.5 FlashSakana Fugu-UltraResult
MRCRv2Source 93.6%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkQwen3.5 FlashSakana Fugu-UltraResult
GPQASource 95.5%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 95.5%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 50%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkQwen3.5 FlashSakana Fugu-UltraResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 6.207%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkQwen3.5 FlashSakana Fugu-UltraResult
CharXivSource 86.6%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Qwen3.5 Flash and Sakana Fugu-Ultra on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Qwen3.5 Flash and Sakana Fugu-Ultra today?

Qwen3.5 Flash: $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens Sakana Fugu-Ultra: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.