Skip to main content

Model comparison

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) vs Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

59.5/100
Margin
0.2pts
winning →
59.72/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) #56 (Estimated); Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) #53 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) and Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 6 results are unique to Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning); 10 to Qwen 3.6 Max (preview).

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
11
Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) only
6
Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) only
10
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) and Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning).

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) and Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)
CategoryQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)ΔQwen 3.6 Max (preview)
AgenticQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen 3.6 Max (preview)65.4
CodingQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen 3.6 Max (preview)51.0
KnowledgeQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen 3.6 Max (preview)73.9
MathQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen 3.6 Max (preview)18.4

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3.6 outputQwen 3.6 Max (preview)Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not availableQwen 3.6 Max (preview)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Not availableQwen 3.6 Max (preview)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)128KQwen 3.6 Max (preview)256KQwen 3.6 Max (preview) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 19.9%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 15.3%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 95.6%95.9%Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) leads
GDPval-AASource 23.1%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 962Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.4%Not comparable
QwenClawBenchSource 59.0%Not comparable
QwenWebBenchSource 1532Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)Result
AA Coding IndexSource 48.2%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 42.0%46.9%Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) leads
SWE-bench ProSource 57.3%Not comparable
SciCodeSource 47%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource 42.9%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.4%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)Result
AA-LCRSource 65.7%69.7%Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) leads
CritPtSource 1.7%3.7%Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 33.7%40.0%Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 89.3%88.8%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 27.3%28.9%Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -29.8%10.2%Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 31.4%37.7%Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 89.1%44.2%Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) leads
SuperGPQASource 73.9%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 23.103%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 4.167%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 77.3%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkQwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Qwen 3.6 Max (preview)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 78.8%76.6%Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) and Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning) and Qwen 3.6 Max (preview) today?

Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.