Skip to main content

Model comparison

Qwen3 235B 2507 vs Sakana Fugu-Ultra

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

56.02/100
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Qwen3 235B 2507 #78 (Estimated); Sakana Fugu-Ultra unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Qwen3 235B 2507 and Sakana Fugu-Ultra share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Qwen3 235B 2507; 10 to Sakana Fugu-Ultra.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
Qwen3 235B 2507 only
3
Sakana Fugu-Ultra only
10
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Qwen3 235B 2507 makes more sense if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model; Sakana Fugu-Ultra is the better fit if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Qwen3 235B 2507 and Sakana Fugu-Ultra finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Sakana Fugu-Ultra is the reasoning model in the pair, while Qwen3 235B 2507 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Sakana Fugu-Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Qwen3 235B 2507.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Qwen3 235B 2507 and Sakana Fugu-Ultra
CategoryQwen3 235B 2507ΔSakana Fugu-Ultra
KnowledgeQwen3 235B 250778.9Margin 16.6Sakana Fugu-Ultra95.5
AgenticQwen3 235B 2507Not measuredMarginNo overlapSakana Fugu-Ultra82.1
CodingQwen3 235B 2507Not measuredMarginNo overlapSakana Fugu-Ultra64.5
ReasoningQwen3 235B 2507Not measuredMarginNo overlapSakana Fugu-Ultra93.6
MultilingualQwen3 235B 250779.4MarginNo overlapSakana Fugu-UltraNot measured
MultimodalQwen3 235B 2507Not measuredMarginNo overlapSakana Fugu-Ultra86.6

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Qwen3 235B 2507B · Sakana Fugu-Ultra
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 77.5%B 95.5%
    Winner: Sakana Fugu-UltraΔ 18
    GPQA: Qwen3 235B 2507 scored 77.5%; Sakana Fugu-Ultra scored 95.5%. Sakana Fugu-Ultra wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricQwen3 235B 2507Sakana Fugu-UltraComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensQwen3 235B 2507$0 input / $0 outputSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondQwen3 235B 2507Not availableSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenQwen3 235B 2507Not availableSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensQwen3 235B 2507128KSakana Fugu-Ultra1MSakana Fugu-Ultra lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkQwen3 235B 2507Sakana Fugu-UltraResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 82.1%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkQwen3 235B 2507Sakana Fugu-UltraResult
SWE-bench ProSource 73.7%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 82.1%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source 93.2%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench ProSource 90.8%Not comparable
SciCodeSource 58.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkQwen3 235B 2507Sakana Fugu-UltraResult
MRCRv2Source 93.6%Not comparable
KnowledgeSakana Fugu-Ultra wins
BenchmarkQwen3 235B 2507Sakana Fugu-UltraResult
GPQASource 77.5%95.5%Sakana Fugu-Ultra leads
SuperGPQASource 62.6%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 83%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 95.5%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 50%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkQwen3 235B 2507Sakana Fugu-UltraResult
MMLU-ProXSource 79.4%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkQwen3 235B 2507Sakana Fugu-UltraResult
CharXivSource 86.6%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Qwen3 235B 2507 or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?

Qwen3 235B 2507 and Sakana Fugu-Ultra are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Qwen3 235B 2507 or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?

Sakana Fugu-Ultra has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 95.5 versus 78.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.