Model comparison
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Sakana Fugu-Ultra
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct #186 (Supported); Sakana Fugu-Ultra unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Sakana Fugu-Ultra share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct; 11 to Sakana Fugu-Ultra.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
- 4
- Sakana Fugu-Ultra only
- 11
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Sakana Fugu-Ultra is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Sakana Fugu-Ultra has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Sakana Fugu-Ultra | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0 input / $0 output | Sakana Fugu-UltraNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructNot available | Sakana Fugu-UltraNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructNot available | Sakana Fugu-UltraNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct128K | Sakana Fugu-Ultra1M | Sakana Fugu-Ultra lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Sakana Fugu-Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 82.1% | Not comparable |
Coding6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Sakana Fugu-Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-SciCodeSource | 27.1% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 73.7% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 82.1% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench v6Source | — | 93.2% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench ProSource | — | 90.8% | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | — | 58.7% | Not comparable |
Reasoning1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Sakana Fugu-Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRCRv2Source | — | 93.6% | Not comparable |
Knowledge6 benchmarks
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct | Sakana Fugu-Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| CharXivSource | — | 86.6% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Sakana Fugu-Ultra on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Sakana Fugu-Ultra today?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Sakana Fugu-Ultra: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.