Skip to main content

Model comparison

o1 vs Qwen3 Max

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

OpenAI
48.1/100
Margin
0.1pts
winning →
Alibaba
48.16/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: o1 #129 (Estimated); Qwen3 Max #128 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. o1 and Qwen3 Max share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to o1; 3 to Qwen3 Max.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
11
o1 only
5
Qwen3 Max only
3
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for o1 and Qwen3 Max is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Qwen3 Max has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for o1.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for o1 and Qwen3 Max
Categoryo1ΔQwen3 Max
Knowledgeo175.7MarginNo overlapQwen3 MaxNot measured
Matho19.3MarginNo overlapQwen3 MaxNot measured
Inst. Followingo192.2MarginNo overlapQwen3 MaxNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

Metrico1Qwen3 MaxComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokenso1$15 input / $60 outputQwen3 MaxNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondo198 tok/sQwen3 MaxNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokeno132.29 sQwen3 MaxNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokenso1200KQwen3 Max1MQwen3 Max lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
Benchmarko1Qwen3 MaxResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 62.6%74.3%Qwen3 Max leads
Gert LabsSource 43.74%Not comparable
Coding
Benchmarko1Qwen3 MaxResult
AA Coding IndexSource 39.7%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 35.8%38.3%Qwen3 Max leads
Vibe Code BenchSource 3.51%Not comparable
Reasoning
Benchmarko1Qwen3 MaxResult
AA-LCRSource 59.3%46.7%o1 leads
CritPtSource 0.3%0.0%o1 leads
Knowledge
Benchmarko1Qwen3 MaxResult
MMLUSource 91.8%Not comparable
GPQASource 75.7%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 23.4%24.0%Qwen3 Max leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 74.7%76.4%Qwen3 Max leads
AA-HLESource 7.7%11.1%Qwen3 Max leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -10.5%-43.1%o1 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 34.7%24.4%o1 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 69.3%89.4%o1 leads
Math
Benchmarko1Qwen3 MaxResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 9.310%Not comparable
Multimodal
Benchmarko1Qwen3 MaxResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1148Not comparable
Inst. Following
Benchmarko1Qwen3 MaxResult
IFEvalSource 92.2%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 70.3%44.1%o1 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare o1 and Qwen3 Max on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for o1 and Qwen3 Max today?

o1: $15.00 input / $60.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.