Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 27 shared benchmark results across 7 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

N/A
No comparison
67.22/100
0 category wins6 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Nemotron 3 Ultra unranked (Not scored); Qwen3.7 Plus #21 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Plus share 27 comparable benchmark results. 6 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to Nemotron 3 Ultra; 42 to Qwen3.7 Plus.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
27
Nemotron 3 Ultra only
11
Qwen3.7 Plus only
42
Comparable categories
6 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Nemotron 3 Ultra makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; Qwen3.7 Plus is the better fit if reasoning is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 27 shared benchmark results across 7 evidence categories; 6 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Plus finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Plus
CategoryNemotron 3 UltraΔQwen3.7 Plus
ReasoningNemotron 3 Ultra61.9Margin→ 29.8Qwen3.7 Plus91.7
AgenticNemotron 3 Ultra51.3Margin→ 20.4Qwen3.7 Plus71.7
CodingNemotron 3 Ultra58.3Margin→ 17.3Qwen3.7 Plus75.6
KnowledgeNemotron 3 Ultra53.8Margin→ 6.3Qwen3.7 Plus60.1
Inst. FollowingNemotron 3 Ultra81.7Margin→ 2.8Qwen3.7 Plus84.5
MultilingualNemotron 3 Ultra83.0Margin→ 2.4Qwen3.7 Plus85.4
MathNemotron 3 UltraNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus92.9
MultimodalNemotron 3 UltraNot measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Plus81.5

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Nemotron 3 UltraB · Qwen3.7 Plus

  1. Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 56.4%B 70.3%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 13.9
    Terminal-Bench 2.0: Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 56.4%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 70.3%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

  2. HLE

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 26.7%B 34.7%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 8
    HLE: Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 26.7%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 34.7%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

  3. SciCode

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 44.6%B 51.3%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 6.7
    SciCode: Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 44.6%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 51.3%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

  4. SWE-bench Verified

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 71.9%B 77.7%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 5.8
    SWE-bench Verified: Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 71.9%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 77.7%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

  5. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 87%B 90.3%
    Winner: Qwen3.7 PlusΔ 3.3
    GPQA: Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 87%; Qwen3.7 Plus scored 90.3%. Qwen3.7 Plus wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 PlusComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensNemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 outputQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondNemotron 3 UltraNot availableQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenNemotron 3 UltraNot availableQwen3.7 PlusNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensNemotron 3 Ultra1MQwen3.7 Plus1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticQwen3.7 Plus wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 PlusResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%70.3%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
PinchBenchSource 90.0%—Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 44.4%—Not comparable
τ³-bench resultsSource 70.9%—Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 33.2%21.8%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
HLE w/ toolsSource 37.4%—Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 27.4%20.8%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 83.3%93%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
GDPval-AASource 1164936Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA BriefcaseSource 870—Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 28.9%—Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 81.7%—Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource 36.4%—Not comparable
QwenClawBenchSource —61.8%Not comparable
QwenWebBenchSource —1536Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource —62.7%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source —72.9%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource —73.2%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource —45.6%Not comparable
DeepPlanningSource —62.3%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource —73.3%Not comparable
AndroidWorldSource —81.0%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource —22.4%Not comparable
OSWorld 2.0Source —2.8%Not comparable
CodingQwen3.7 Plus wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 PlusResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 71.9%77.7%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
SWE MultilingualSource 67.7%75.8%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
SciCodeSource 44.6%51.3%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 56.4%70.3%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA Coding IndexSource 49.3%55.9%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-SciCodeSource 39.9%45.5%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
SWE-bench ProSource —57.6%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource —41.1%Not comparable
LiveCodeBenchSource —89.6%Not comparable
ReasoningQwen3.7 Plus wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 PlusResult
AA-LCRSource 67.0%65.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
CritPtSource 3.1%9.1%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
LongBench v2Source 61.9%—Not comparable
MRCRv2Source —91.7%Not comparable
KnowledgeQwen3.7 Plus wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 PlusResult
GPQASource 87%90.3%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
GPQA-DSource 87.0%90.3%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
HLESource 26.7%34.7%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
HLE w/o toolsSource 26.7%—Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 86.8%88.5%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 21.6%22.2%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 37.8%39.0%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.7%90.0%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-HLESource 26.6%33.4%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -0.8%2.4%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 28.5%25.5%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
AA Openness IndexSource 83.3%—Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource —94.5%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource —71.4%Not comparable
MMMLUSource —89.0%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 PlusResult
HMMT Feb 2026Source —92.9%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource —86.0%Not comparable
ApexSource —22.7%Not comparable
MultilingualQwen3.7 Plus wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 PlusResult
MMLU-ProXSource 83%85.4%Qwen3.7 Plus leads
NOVA-63Source —58.8%Not comparable
INCLUDESource —83.0%Not comparable
MAXIFESource —88.8%Not comparable
PolyMathSource —84.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 PlusResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 11291288Qwen3.7 Plus leads
MMMU-ProSource —79%Not comparable
MathVisionSource —90.3%Not comparable
CharXivSource —85.9%Not comparable
ERQASource —69.8%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source —71.0%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource —79.0%Not comparable
SimpleVQASource —81.7%Not comparable
MMSearch-PlusSource —41.4%Not comparable
RealWorldQASource —86.9%Not comparable
OmniDocBench 1.5Source —91.4%Not comparable
OCRBench V2Source —70.7%Not comparable
ODINW13Source —51.1%Not comparable
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source —88.0%Not comparable
VideoMMMUSource —85.4%Not comparable
MLVU (M-Avg)Source —87.4%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource —80.5%Not comparable
Inst. FollowingQwen3.7 Plus wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 UltraQwen3.7 PlusResult
IFBenchSource 81.7%79.1%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
AA-IFBenchSource 81.4%78.0%Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
IFEvalSource —94.6%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (7)

Which is better, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.7 Plus are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 60.1 versus 53.8. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 75.6 versus 58.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 91.7 versus 61.9. Inside this category, CritPt is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.7 versus 51.3. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 84.5 versus 81.7. Inside this category, AA-IFBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 85.4 versus 83. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

NVIDIA Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.