Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B vs Sakana Fugu-Ultra

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 4 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

44.24/100
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins3 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B #151 (Estimated); Sakana Fugu-Ultra unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Sakana Fugu-Ultra share 4 comparable benchmark results. 3 of 8 categories are comparable. 25 results are unique to Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B; 7 to Sakana Fugu-Ultra.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
4
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
25
Sakana Fugu-Ultra only
7
Comparable categories
3 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; Sakana Fugu-Ultra is the better fit if coding is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 4 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 3 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Sakana Fugu-Ultra finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Sakana Fugu-Ultra gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Sakana Fugu-Ultra
CategoryNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BΔSakana Fugu-Ultra
CodingNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B32.0Margin→ 32.5Sakana Fugu-Ultra64.5
KnowledgeNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3Margin→ 19.2Sakana Fugu-Ultra95.5
MultimodalNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3Margin→ 10.3Sakana Fugu-Ultra86.6
AgenticNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot measuredMarginNo overlapSakana Fugu-Ultra82.1
ReasoningNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot measuredMarginNo overlapSakana Fugu-Ultra93.6
Inst. FollowingNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B74.2MarginNo overlapSakana Fugu-UltraNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BB · Sakana Fugu-Ultra

  1. SciCode

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 32%B 58.7%
    Winner: Sakana Fugu-UltraΔ 26.7
    SciCode: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 32%; Sakana Fugu-Ultra scored 58.7%. Sakana Fugu-Ultra wins this benchmark.

  2. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 72.2%B 95.5%
    Winner: Sakana Fugu-UltraΔ 23.3
    GPQA: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 72.2%; Sakana Fugu-Ultra scored 95.5%. Sakana Fugu-Ultra wins this benchmark.

  3. CharXiv

    Multimodal
    Source ↗
    A 76.3%B 86.6%
    Winner: Sakana Fugu-UltraΔ 10.3
    CharXiv: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B scored 76.3%; Sakana Fugu-Ultra scored 86.6%. Sakana Fugu-Ultra wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BSakana Fugu-UltraComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B$0 input / $0 outputSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot availableSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot availableSakana Fugu-UltraNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B256KSakana Fugu-Ultra1MSakana Fugu-Ultra lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BSakana Fugu-UltraResult
OSWorldSource 47.4%—Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 45.3%—Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%—Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 467—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —82.1%Not comparable
CodingSakana Fugu-Ultra wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BSakana Fugu-UltraResult
SciCodeSource 32%58.7%Sakana Fugu-Ultra leads
AA-SciCodeSource 27.8%—Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 13.8%—Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource —73.7%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —82.1%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source —93.2%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench ProSource —90.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BSakana Fugu-UltraResult
AA-LCRSource 35.7%—Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%—Not comparable
MRCRv2Source —93.6%Not comparable
KnowledgeSakana Fugu-Ultra wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BSakana Fugu-UltraResult
MMLU-ProSource 77.3%—Not comparable
GPQASource 72.2%95.5%Sakana Fugu-Ultra leads
GPQA-DSource 72.2%95.5%Sakana Fugu-Ultra leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 14.9%—Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 46.9%—Not comparable
AA-HLESource 5.3%—Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -56.0%—Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 14.8%—Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 83.1%—Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource —50%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BSakana Fugu-UltraResult
AIME 2025Source 82.1%—Not comparable
MultimodalSakana Fugu-Ultra wins
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BSakana Fugu-UltraResult
MMMUSource 70.8%—Not comparable
MMLongBench-DocSource 57.5%—Not comparable
CharXivSource 76.3%86.6%Sakana Fugu-Ultra leads
ScreenSpot ProSource 57.8%—Not comparable
Video-MME (w/o subtitle)Source 72.2%—Not comparable
AI2D_TESTSource 88.5%—Not comparable
RefCOCO (avg)Source 90.5%—Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 53.2%—Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BSakana Fugu-UltraResult
IFBenchSource 74.2%—Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 63.2%—Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B and Sakana Fugu-Ultra are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?

Sakana Fugu-Ultra has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 95.5 versus 76.3. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?

Sakana Fugu-Ultra has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 64.5 versus 32. Inside this category, SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B or Sakana Fugu-Ultra?

Sakana Fugu-Ultra has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 86.6 versus 76.3. Inside this category, CharXiv is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

NVIDIA Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.