Skip to main content

Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs ZAYA1-8B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
77.44/100
No comparison
Zyphra
N/A
0 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Muse Spark 1.1 #6 (Supported); ZAYA1-8B unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Muse Spark 1.1 and ZAYA1-8B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 39 results are unique to Muse Spark 1.1; 11 to ZAYA1-8B.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
Muse Spark 1.1 only
39
ZAYA1-8B only
11
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Muse Spark 1.1 makes more sense if you need the larger 1M context window; ZAYA1-8B is the better fit if knowledge is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Muse Spark 1.1 and ZAYA1-8B finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Muse Spark 1.1 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 131K for ZAYA1-8B.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMuse Spark 1.1ZAYA1-8BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMuse Spark 1.1Not availableZAYA1-8B$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMuse Spark 1.1Not availableZAYA1-8BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMuse Spark 1.1Not availableZAYA1-8BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMuse Spark 1.11MZAYA1-8B131KMuse Spark 1.1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1ZAYA1-8BResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 80%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 88.1%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 75.6%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 80.8%Not comparable
DeepSearchQASource 84.9%Not comparable
CyberGymSource 59.0%Not comparable
Finance Agent v2Source 57.2%Not comparable
deepSweSource 53.3%Not comparable
OSWorld 2.0Source 14.2%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 54.7%Not comparable
CybenchSource 92.9%Not comparable
ExploitGymSource 0.8%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 37.5%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 43.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1374Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 863Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource 42.8%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 93.1%Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 25.2%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source 77.9%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source 39.2%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1ZAYA1-8BResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 80.0%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 61.5%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 71.3%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 58.2%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source 65.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1ZAYA1-8BResult
MRCR 1MSource 54.1%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 63.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 15.1%Not comparable
KnowledgeZAYA1-8B wins
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1ZAYA1-8BResult
HLESource 62.1%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 52.2%Not comparable
HealthBench ProfessionalSource 59.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 50.6%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 89.8%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 45.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 18.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 40.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 38.1%Not comparable
GPQASource 71%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 71.0%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 74.2%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1ZAYA1-8BResult
AIME26Source 89.1%Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source 71.6%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource 59.3%Not comparable
ApexSource 32.2%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1ZAYA1-8BResult
CharXivSource 88.4%Not comparable
BabyVisionSource 76.3%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1299Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1ZAYA1-8BResult
IFEvalSource 85.6%Not comparable
IFBenchSource 52.6%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or ZAYA1-8B?

Muse Spark 1.1 and ZAYA1-8B are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Muse Spark 1.1 or ZAYA1-8B?

ZAYA1-8B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.6 versus 62.1. Muse Spark 1.1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.