Model comparison
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Soofi S 30B-A3B
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Muse Spark 1.1 #6 (Supported); Soofi S 30B-A3B unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Muse Spark 1.1 and Soofi S 30B-A3B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 39 results are unique to Muse Spark 1.1; 8 to Soofi S 30B-A3B.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Muse Spark 1.1 only
- 39
- Soofi S 30B-A3B only
- 8
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. Muse Spark 1.1 makes more sense if knowledge is the priority or you want the stronger reasoning-first profile; Soofi S 30B-A3B is the better fit if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Muse Spark 1.1 and Soofi S 30B-A3B finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Muse Spark 1.1 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Soofi S 30B-A3B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Muse Spark 1.1 | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Muse Spark 1.1Not available | Soofi S 30B-A3B$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Muse Spark 1.1Not available | Soofi S 30B-A3BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Muse Spark 1.1Not available | Soofi S 30B-A3BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Muse Spark 1.11M | Soofi S 30B-A3B1M | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic20 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 80% | — | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | 88.1% | — | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | 75.6% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 80.8% | — | Not comparable |
| DeepSearchQASource | 84.9% | — | Not comparable |
| CyberGymSource | 59.0% | — | Not comparable |
| Finance Agent v2Source | 57.2% | — | Not comparable |
| deepSweSource | 53.3% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld 2.0Source | 14.2% | — | Not comparable |
| JobBenchSource | 54.7% | — | Not comparable |
| CybenchSource | 92.9% | — | Not comparable |
| ExploitGymSource | 0.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 37.5% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 43.7% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1374 | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 863 | — | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | 42.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | 93.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 25.2% | — | Not comparable |
| aaTerminalBench21Source | 77.9% | — | Not comparable |
Coding5 benchmarks
Reasoning5 benchmarks
KnowledgeMuse Spark 1.1 wins13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLESource | 62.1% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | 52.2% | — | Not comparable |
| HealthBench ProfessionalSource | 59.3% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 50.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 89.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 45.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 18.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 40.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 38.1% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | — | 43.4% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 43.4% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 51.4% | Not comparable |
| AGIEvalSource | — | 66.9% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.1 | Soofi S 30B-A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSM8KSource | — | 86.1% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or Soofi S 30B-A3B?
Muse Spark 1.1 and Soofi S 30B-A3B are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Muse Spark 1.1 or Soofi S 30B-A3B?
Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.1 versus 49.9. Soofi S 30B-A3B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.