Skip to main content

Model comparison

Mistral Small 4 vs Qwen3.5 Plus

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
46.23/100
Margin
1.0pts
winning →
47.2/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Mistral Small 4 #140 (Estimated); Qwen3.5 Plus #138 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Mistral Small 4 and Qwen3.5 Plus share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 16 results are unique to Mistral Small 4; 4 to Qwen3.5 Plus.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
Mistral Small 4 only
16
Qwen3.5 Plus only
4
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Mistral Small 4 and Qwen3.5 Plus is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Qwen3.5 Plus is priced at $0.40 input / $2.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens for Mistral Small 4. Qwen3.5 Plus has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Mistral Small 4.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMistral Small 4Qwen3.5 PlusComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMistral Small 4$0.15 input / $0.6 outputQwen3.5 Plus$0.4 input / $2.4 outputMistral Small 4 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondMistral Small 4175 tok/sQwen3.5 PlusNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMistral Small 40.64 sQwen3.5 PlusNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMistral Small 4256KQwen3.5 Plus1MQwen3.5 Plus lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen3.5 PlusResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 4.7%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 41.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 4.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 588Not comparable
JobBenchSource 18.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen3.5 PlusResult
AA Coding IndexSource 26.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 38.0%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 15.74%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen3.5 PlusResult
AA-LCRSource 44.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen3.5 PlusResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 19.6%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 76.9%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 9.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -29.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 66.8%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen3.5 PlusResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 21.034%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.083%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen3.5 PlusResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 56.8%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMistral Small 4Qwen3.5 PlusResult
AA-IFBenchSource 48.2%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Mistral Small 4 and Qwen3.5 Plus on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Mistral Small 4 and Qwen3.5 Plus today?

Mistral Small 4: $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens Qwen3.5 Plus: $0.40 input / $2.40 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Mistral Small 4
API / mo$563
Self-host / mo$2,278
Break-even266M/day
Qwen3.5 Plus
API / mo$2,100
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.