Model comparison
MiniMax M2.5 vs Sakana Fugu-Ultra
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: MiniMax M2.5 #55 (Supported); Sakana Fugu-Ultra unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. MiniMax M2.5 and Sakana Fugu-Ultra share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to MiniMax M2.5; 11 to Sakana Fugu-Ultra.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- MiniMax M2.5 only
- 1
- Sakana Fugu-Ultra only
- 11
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for MiniMax M2.5 and Sakana Fugu-Ultra is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Sakana Fugu-Ultra has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for MiniMax M2.5.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | MiniMax M2.5 | Sakana Fugu-Ultra | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | MiniMax M2.5$0.3 input / $1.2 output | Sakana Fugu-UltraNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | MiniMax M2.546 tok/s | Sakana Fugu-UltraNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | MiniMax M2.52.12 s | Sakana Fugu-UltraNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | MiniMax M2.5128K | Sakana Fugu-Ultra1M | Sakana Fugu-Ultra lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiniMax M2.5 | Sakana Fugu-Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 82.1% | Not comparable |
Coding6 benchmarks
Reasoning1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiniMax M2.5 | Sakana Fugu-Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRCRv2Source | — | 93.6% | Not comparable |
Knowledge3 benchmarks
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiniMax M2.5 | Sakana Fugu-Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| CharXivSource | — | 86.6% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare MiniMax M2.5 and Sakana Fugu-Ultra on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for MiniMax M2.5 and Sakana Fugu-Ultra today?
MiniMax M2.5: $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens Sakana Fugu-Ultra: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.