Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

MiniCPM5-1B vs Muse Spark 1.1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
N/A
No comparison
77.44/100
0 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: MiniCPM5-1B unranked (Not scored); Muse Spark 1.1 #6 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. MiniCPM5-1B and Muse Spark 1.1 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 14 results are unique to MiniCPM5-1B; 39 to Muse Spark 1.1.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
MiniCPM5-1B only
14
Muse Spark 1.1 only
39
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. MiniCPM5-1B makes more sense if its workflow fits your team better; Muse Spark 1.1 is the better fit if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 1M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

MiniCPM5-1B and Muse Spark 1.1 finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Muse Spark 1.1 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 131K for MiniCPM5-1B.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricMiniCPM5-1BMuse Spark 1.1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensMiniCPM5-1BNot availableMuse Spark 1.1Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondMiniCPM5-1BNot availableMuse Spark 1.1Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenMiniCPM5-1BNot availableMuse Spark 1.1Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensMiniCPM5-1B131KMuse Spark 1.11MMuse Spark 1.1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkMiniCPM5-1BMuse Spark 1.1Result
BFCL v4Source 25.1%—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —80%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource —88.1%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource —75.6%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource —80.8%Not comparable
DeepSearchQASource —84.9%Not comparable
CyberGymSource —59.0%Not comparable
Finance Agent v2Source —57.2%Not comparable
deepSweSource —53.3%Not comparable
OSWorld 2.0Source —14.2%Not comparable
JobBenchSource —54.7%Not comparable
CybenchSource —92.9%Not comparable
ExploitGymSource —0.8%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource —37.5%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —43.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —1374Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource —863Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource —42.8%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource —93.1%Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource —25.2%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source —77.9%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkMiniCPM5-1BMuse Spark 1.1Result
LiveCodeBench ProSource 22.7%—Not comparable
LiveCodeBench v6Source 33.5%—Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source —80.0%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource —61.5%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource —71.3%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource —58.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkMiniCPM5-1BMuse Spark 1.1Result
BBHSource 71.9%—Not comparable
MRCR 1MSource —54.1%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource —63.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource —15.1%Not comparable
KnowledgeMuse Spark 1.1 wins
BenchmarkMiniCPM5-1BMuse Spark 1.1Result
MMLU-ProSource 48.9%—Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource 70.1%—Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 26.3%—Not comparable
SuperGPQASource 23.1%—Not comparable
HLESource —62.1%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource —52.2%Not comparable
HealthBench ProfessionalSource —59.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource —50.6%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource —89.8%Not comparable
AA-HLESource —45.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource —18.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource —40.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource —38.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkMiniCPM5-1BMuse Spark 1.1Result
AIME 2025Source 40.4%—Not comparable
AIME26Source 40.4%—Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source 25.8%—Not comparable
MATH-500Source 91.6%—Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkMiniCPM5-1BMuse Spark 1.1Result
CharXivSource —88.4%Not comparable
BabyVisionSource —76.3%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1299Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkMiniCPM5-1BMuse Spark 1.1Result
IFBenchSource 46.7%—Not comparable
IFEvalSource 80.4%—Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, MiniCPM5-1B or Muse Spark 1.1?

MiniCPM5-1B and Muse Spark 1.1 are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, MiniCPM5-1B or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.1 versus 44. MiniCPM5-1B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

OpenBMB Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.