Model comparison
Interfaze Beta vs Muse Spark 1.1
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Interfaze Beta unranked (Not scored); Muse Spark 1.1 #6 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Interfaze Beta and Muse Spark 1.1 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to Interfaze Beta; 39 to Muse Spark 1.1.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Interfaze Beta only
- 10
- Muse Spark 1.1 only
- 39
- Comparable categories
- 2 / 8
Treat this as a split decision. Interfaze Beta makes more sense if knowledge is the priority; Muse Spark 1.1 is the better fit if multimodal & grounded is the priority.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Interfaze Beta and Muse Spark 1.1 finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Interfaze Beta | Muse Spark 1.1 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Interfaze Beta$1.5 input / $3.5 output | Muse Spark 1.1Not available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Interfaze BetaNot available | Muse Spark 1.1Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Interfaze BetaNot available | Muse Spark 1.1Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Interfaze Beta1M | Muse Spark 1.11M | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic20 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Interfaze Beta | Muse Spark 1.1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 80% | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | — | 88.1% | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | — | 75.6% | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | — | 80.8% | Not comparable |
| DeepSearchQASource | — | 84.9% | Not comparable |
| CyberGymSource | — | 59.0% | Not comparable |
| Finance Agent v2Source | — | 57.2% | Not comparable |
| deepSweSource | — | 53.3% | Not comparable |
| OSWorld 2.0Source | — | 14.2% | Not comparable |
| JobBenchSource | — | 54.7% | Not comparable |
| CybenchSource | — | 92.9% | Not comparable |
| ExploitGymSource | — | 0.8% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 37.5% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 43.7% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1374 | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 863 | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | — | 42.8% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 93.1% | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | — | 25.2% | Not comparable |
| aaTerminalBench21Source | — | 77.9% | Not comparable |
Coding5 benchmarks
Reasoning3 benchmarks
KnowledgeInterfaze Beta wins12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Interfaze Beta | Muse Spark 1.1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 89.9% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | 89.9% | — | Not comparable |
| MMMLUSource | 90.9% | — | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 62.1% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 52.2% | Not comparable |
| HealthBench ProfessionalSource | — | 59.3% | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 50.6% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 89.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 45.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | 18.0% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 40.6% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 38.1% | Not comparable |
MultimodalMuse Spark 1.1 wins8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Interfaze Beta | Muse Spark 1.1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCRBench V2Source | 70.7% | — | Not comparable |
| olmOCRSource | 85.7% | — | Not comparable |
| RefCOCO (avg)Source | 82.1% | — | Not comparable |
| VoxPopuli WERSource | 2.4% | — | Not comparable |
| MMMU-ProSource | 71.1% | — | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | — | 88.4% | Not comparable |
| BabyVisionSource | — | 76.3% | Not comparable |
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1299 | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Interfaze Beta | Muse Spark 1.1 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOB Value AccSource | 79.5% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Which is better, Interfaze Beta or Muse Spark 1.1?
Interfaze Beta and Muse Spark 1.1 are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, Interfaze Beta or Muse Spark 1.1?
Interfaze Beta has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 89.9 versus 62.1. Muse Spark 1.1 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Interfaze Beta or Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 88.4 versus 71.1. Interfaze Beta stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.