Skip to main content

Model comparison

Hy3 Preview vs Kimi K3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 17 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

N/A
No comparison
Moonshot AI
80.96/100
0 category wins2 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Hy3 Preview unranked (Not scored); Kimi K3 #4 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Hy3 Preview and Kimi K3 share 17 comparable benchmark results. 2 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Hy3 Preview; 40 to Kimi K3.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
17
Hy3 Preview only
5
Kimi K3 only
40
Comparable categories
2 / 8

Treat this as a split decision. Hy3 Preview makes more sense if you want the cheaper token bill; Kimi K3 is the better fit if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1.05M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 17 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 2 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Hy3 Preview and Kimi K3 finish on the same BenchAlign overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The BenchAlign headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Kimi K3 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Hy3 Preview. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Kimi K3 gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 256K for Hy3 Preview.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Hy3 Preview and Kimi K3
CategoryHy3 PreviewΔKimi K3
AgenticHy3 Preview54.4Margin 35.1Kimi K389.5
KnowledgeHy3 Preview33.8Margin 27.2Kimi K361.0
CodingHy3 Preview57.8MarginNo overlapKimi K3Not measured
MultimodalHy3 PreviewNot measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K378.5
Inst. FollowingHy3 Preview63.1MarginNo overlapKimi K3Not measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Hy3 PreviewB · Kimi K3
  1. Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 54.4%B 88.3%
    Winner: Kimi K3Δ 33.9
    Terminal-Bench 2.0: Hy3 Preview scored 54.4%; Kimi K3 scored 88.3%. Kimi K3 wins this benchmark.
  2. HLE

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 25.5%B 56%
    Winner: Kimi K3Δ 30.5
    HLE: Hy3 Preview scored 25.5%; Kimi K3 scored 56%. Kimi K3 wins this benchmark.
  3. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 87.2%B 93.5%
    Winner: Kimi K3Δ 6.3
    GPQA: Hy3 Preview scored 87.2%; Kimi K3 scored 93.5%. Kimi K3 wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricHy3 PreviewKimi K3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensHy3 Preview$0 input / $0 outputKimi K3$3 input / $15 outputHy3 Preview has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondHy3 PreviewNot availableKimi K3Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenHy3 PreviewNot availableKimi K3Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensHy3 Preview256KKimi K31.05MKimi K3 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticKimi K3 wins
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewKimi K3Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 54.4%88.3%Kimi K3 leads
Gert LabsSource 36.91%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 30.7%50.1%Kimi K3 leads
GDPval-AASource 35.7%59.0%Kimi K3 leads
GDPval-AASource 12141679Kimi K3 leads
BrowseCompSource 91.2%Not comparable
DeepSearchQASource 95.0%Not comparable
Toolathlon-VerifiedSource 73.2%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 84.2%Not comparable
AutomationBenchSource 30.8%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 52.9%Not comparable
APEX-AgentsSource 37.6%Not comparable
SpreadsheetBench 2Source 34.8%Not comparable
DECK-BenchSource 73.5%Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 1543Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource 52.7%Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 45.3%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 94.6%Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 33.4%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source 85%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 41.3%Not comparable
AA ITBenchSource 47.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewKimi K3Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 74.4%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 54.4%Not comparable
SciCodeSource 41.2%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 47.6%58.7%Kimi K3 leads
AA Coding IndexSource 58.8%76.2%Kimi K3 leads
deepSweSource 67.5%Not comparable
FrontierSWESource 81.2%Not comparable
ProgramBenchSource 77.8%Not comparable
Kimi Code Bench v2Source 72.9%Not comparable
sweMarathonSource 42%Not comparable
PostTrain BenchSource 36.6%Not comparable
MLS-Bench LiteSource 48.3%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewKimi K3Result
AA-LCRSource 66.7%74.7%Kimi K3 leads
CritPtSource 4.9%23.4%Kimi K3 leads
KnowledgeKimi K3 wins
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewKimi K3Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 41.2%57.1%Kimi K3 leads
GPQASource 87.2%93.5%Kimi K3 leads
GPQA-DSource 87.2%93.5%Kimi K3 leads
HLESource 25.5%56%Kimi K3 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 31.5%46.0%Kimi K3 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 73.0%50.9%Kimi K3 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 89.7%93.5%Kimi K3 leads
AA-HLESource 31.6%44.3%Kimi K3 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -18.5%18.4%Kimi K3 leads
HLE w/o toolsSource 43.5%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewKimi K3Result
OfficeQA ProSource 63.3%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 81.6%Not comparable
MMMU-Pro w/ PythonSource 83.4%Not comparable
CharXiv w/o toolsSource 84.8%Not comparable
CharXivSource 91.3%Not comparable
MathVisionSource 94.3%Not comparable
MathVision w/ PythonSource 97.8%Not comparable
BabyVision w/ PythonSource 85.7%Not comparable
ZeroBenchSource 23.0%Not comparable
ZeroBench w/ PythonSource 41.0%Not comparable
WorldVQA ForceAnswerSource 51.0%Not comparable
OmniDocBenchSource 91.1%Not comparable
PerceptionBenchSource 58.5%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 80.5%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1386Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkHy3 PreviewKimi K3Result
IFBenchSource 63.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Hy3 Preview or Kimi K3?

Hy3 Preview and Kimi K3 are tied on the BenchAlign overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Hy3 Preview or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 61 versus 33.8. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Index is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Hy3 Preview or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 89.5 versus 54.4. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.