Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok 4 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

60.42/100
Margin
0.1pts
winning →
60.56/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok 4 #50 (Supported); Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #47 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok 4 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 4 results are unique to Grok 4; 19 to Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
12
Grok 4 only
4
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only
19
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Grok 4 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the larger context window at 262K, compared with 128K for Grok 4.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Grok 4 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
CategoryGrok 4ΔQwen3.5-122B-A10B
AgenticGrok 4Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5-122B-A10B56.4
CodingGrok 4Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5-122B-A10B72.0
ReasoningGrok 4Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5-122B-A10B60.2
KnowledgeGrok 4Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5-122B-A10B83.6
MathGrok 415.3MarginNo overlapQwen3.5-122B-A10BNot measured
MultilingualGrok 4Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5-122B-A10B82.2
MultimodalGrok 4Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5-122B-A10B77.2
Inst. FollowingGrok 4Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.5-122B-A10B93.4

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok 4Qwen3.5-122B-A10BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok 4Not availableQwen3.5-122B-A10B$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok 454 tok/sQwen3.5-122B-A10BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok 415.60 sQwen3.5-122B-A10BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok 4128KQwen3.5-122B-A10B262KQwen3.5-122B-A10B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.5-122B-A10BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 74.9%93.6%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
Gert LabsSource 42.34%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 49.4%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 63.8%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 58%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 20.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 23.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 978Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.5-122B-A10BResult
React Native EvalsSource 72.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 45.7%42.0%Grok 4 leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 72%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 45.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.5-122B-A10BResult
AA-LCRSource 68.0%66.7%Grok 4 leads
CritPtSource 2.0%0.6%Grok 4 leads
LongBench v2Source 60.2%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.5-122B-A10BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 33.3%32.3%Grok 4 leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 87.7%85.7%Grok 4 leads
AA-HLESource 23.9%23.4%Grok 4 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 3.8%-39.6%Grok 4 leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 41.4%24.7%Grok 4 leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 64.2%85.5%Grok 4 leads
MMLU-ProSource 86.7%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource 67.1%Not comparable
GPQASource 86.6%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.5-122B-A10BResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 19.655%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.083%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.5-122B-A10BResult
MMLU-ProXSource 82.2%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.5-122B-A10BResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 68.8%75.0%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
MMMUSource 83.9%Not comparable
MMVUSource 74.7%Not comparable
MathVisionSource 86.2%Not comparable
CharXivSource 77.2%Not comparable
V*Source 93.2%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGrok 4Qwen3.5-122B-A10BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 53.7%75.7%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads
IFEvalSource 93.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Grok 4 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Grok 4 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B today?

Grok 4: Pricing unavailable Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.