Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok 4.1 Fast vs Mercury 2

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
51.25/100
No comparison
Inception
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok 4.1 Fast #107 (Supported); Mercury 2 #105 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok 4.1 Fast and Mercury 2 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 13 results are unique to Grok 4.1 Fast; 0 to Mercury 2.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
Grok 4.1 Fast only
13
Mercury 2 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Grok 4.1 Fast and Mercury 2 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Mercury 2 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Mercury 2 is priced at $0.25 input / $0.75 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens for Grok 4.1 Fast. Grok 4.1 Fast has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Mercury 2.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok 4.1 FastMercury 2Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok 4.1 Fast$0.2 input / $0.5 outputMercury 2$0.25 input / $0.75 outputGrok 4.1 Fast has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok 4.1 Fast138 tok/sMercury 2789 tok/sMercury 2 has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok 4.1 Fast0.54 sMercury 23.88 sGrok 4.1 Fast reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok 4.1 Fast1MMercury 2128KGrok 4.1 Fast lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastMercury 2Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 63.7%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 47.32%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastMercury 2Result
AA-SciCodeSource 29.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastMercury 2Result
AA-LCRSource 22.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastMercury 2Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 16.9%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 63.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 5.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -50.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 17.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 81.8%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastMercury 2Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 48.4%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastMercury 2Result
AA-IFBenchSource 36.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Grok 4.1 Fast and Mercury 2 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Grok 4.1 Fast and Mercury 2 today?

Grok 4.1 Fast: $0.20 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens Mercury 2: $0.25 input / $0.75 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.