Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok 4.1 Fast vs Grok 4.20

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

51.25/100
Margin
3.4pts
winning →
54.68/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok 4.1 Fast #107 (Supported); Grok 4.20 #88 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok 4.1 Fast and Grok 4.20 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to Grok 4.1 Fast; 17 to Grok 4.20.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
Grok 4.1 Fast only
12
Grok 4.20 only
17
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Grok 4.1 Fast and Grok 4.20 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok 4.20 is priced at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens for Grok 4.1 Fast. Grok 4.20 has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 1M for Grok 4.1 Fast.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Grok 4.1 Fast and Grok 4.20
CategoryGrok 4.1 FastΔGrok 4.20
AgenticGrok 4.1 FastNot measuredMarginNo overlapGrok 4.2047.1
CodingGrok 4.1 FastNot measuredMarginNo overlapGrok 4.2067.1
ReasoningGrok 4.1 FastNot measuredMarginNo overlapGrok 4.2053.3
MultimodalGrok 4.1 FastNot measuredMarginNo overlapGrok 4.2070.1

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok 4.1 FastGrok 4.20Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok 4.1 Fast$0.2 input / $0.5 outputGrok 4.20$2 input / $6 outputGrok 4.1 Fast has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok 4.1 Fast138 tok/sGrok 4.20233 tok/sGrok 4.20 has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok 4.1 Fast0.54 sGrok 4.2010.33 sGrok 4.1 Fast reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok 4.1 Fast1MGrok 4.202MGrok 4.20 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastGrok 4.20Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 63.7%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 47.32%38.36%Grok 4.1 Fast leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 47.1%Not comparable
DeepSearchQASource 62.8%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastGrok 4.20Result
AA-SciCodeSource 29.6%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench ProSource 74.2%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 76.7%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 51.8%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 4.06%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastGrok 4.20Result
AA-LCRSource 22.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
ARC-AGI-2Source 53.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastGrok 4.20Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 16.9%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 63.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 5.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -50.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 17.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 81.8%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 88.5%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 31.6%Not comparable
HealthBench HardSource 20.3%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (Text)Source 50.2%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastGrok 4.20Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 48.4%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 75.2%Not comparable
CharXivSource 60.9%Not comparable
ERQASource 54.1%Not comparable
SimpleVQASource 57.4%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source 65.8%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1257Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastGrok 4.20Result
AA-IFBenchSource 36.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Grok 4.1 Fast and Grok 4.20 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Grok 4.1 Fast and Grok 4.20 today?

Grok 4.1 Fast: $0.20 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens Grok 4.20: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.