Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5 nano vs Mistral Small 4

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
N/A
No comparison
46.23/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5 nano #139 (Estimated); Mistral Small 4 #140 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5 nano and Mistral Small 4 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to GPT-5 nano; 16 to Mistral Small 4.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
GPT-5 nano only
0
Mistral Small 4 only
16
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5 nano and Mistral Small 4 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for GPT-5 nano yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Mistral Small 4 is priced at $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.05 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens for GPT-5 nano. GPT-5 nano has the larger context window at 400K, compared with 256K for Mistral Small 4.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5 nanoMistral Small 4Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5 nano$0.05 input / $0.4 outputMistral Small 4$0.15 input / $0.6 outputGPT-5 nano has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5 nano137 tok/sMistral Small 4175 tok/sMistral Small 4 has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5 nano83.30 sMistral Small 40.64 sMistral Small 4 reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5 nano400KMistral Small 4256KGPT-5 nano lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5 nanoMistral Small 4Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 4.7%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 41.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 4.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 588Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5 nanoMistral Small 4Result
AA Coding IndexSource 26.6%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 38.0%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5 nanoMistral Small 4Result
AA-LCRSource 44.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5 nanoMistral Small 4Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 19.6%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 76.9%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 9.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -29.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 66.8%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5 nanoMistral Small 4Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 56.8%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5 nanoMistral Small 4Result
AA-IFBenchSource 48.2%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5 nano and Mistral Small 4 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5 nano and Mistral Small 4 today?

GPT-5 nano: $0.05 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens Mistral Small 4: $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GPT-5 nano
API / mo$338
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Mistral Small 4
API / mo$563
Self-host / mo$2,278
Break-even266M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.