Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 16 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

81.96/100
No comparison
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.6 Sol #3 (Supported); Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) share 16 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 30 results are unique to GPT-5.6 Sol; 0 to Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning).

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
16
GPT-5.6 Sol only
30
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 16 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-5.6 Sol is priced at $5.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens for Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning). GPT-5.6 Sol has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning).

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)
CategoryGPT-5.6 SolΔMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)
AgenticGPT-5.6 Sol92.0MarginNo overlapMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Not measured
CodingGPT-5.6 Sol64.6MarginNo overlapMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Not measured
KnowledgeGPT-5.6 Sol94.6MarginNo overlapMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Not measured
MathGPT-5.6 Sol87.5MarginNo overlapMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Not measured
MultimodalGPT-5.6 Sol83.0MarginNo overlapMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.6 SolMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.6 Sol$5 input / $30 outputMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)$0.15 input / $0.6 outputMistral Small 4 (Reasoning) has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.6 SolNot availableMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.6 SolNot availableMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.6 Sol1MMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)256KGPT-5.6 Sol lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 SolMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 91.9%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 92.2%Not comparable
OSWorld 2.0Source 62.6%Not comparable
CyberGymSource 84.5%Not comparable
ExploitGymSource 33.7%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 58%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 54.0%4.7%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 85.1%41.2%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
GDPval-AASource 61.8%4.4%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
GDPval-AASource 1736588GPT-5.6 Sol leads
AA BriefcaseSource 1501Not comparable
AA ITBenchSource 56.2%Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 33.0%Not comparable
AA AutomationBenchSource 51.2%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 87.2%Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource 65.9%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source 88%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 SolMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Result
SWE-bench ProSource 64.6%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 91.9%Not comparable
deepSweSource 72.7%Not comparable
FrontierCode 1.1 ExtendedSource 60.6%Not comparable
cursorBench32Source 67.2%Not comparable
VulcanBench v3Source 87.0%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 77.4%26.6%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
AA-SciCodeSource 56.1%38.0%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 SolMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Result
ARC-AGI-3Source 7.8%Not comparable
GeneBench-ProSource 28.7%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 73.7%44.7%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
CritPtSource 32.3%0.3%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 SolMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Result
GPQASource 94.6%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 94.6%Not comparable
HealthBench ProfessionalSource 60.5%Not comparable
HealthBench HardSource 33.1%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 58.9%19.6%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 94.1%76.9%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
AA-HLESource 47.2%9.5%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 21.7%-29.9%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 58.5%22.1%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 88.8%66.8%Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) leads
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 SolMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Result
FrontierMath (legacy)Source 89%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 89.000%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 83.000%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 SolMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Result
MMMU-ProSource 83%Not comparable
MMMU-Pro w/ PythonSource 84.6%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 83.4%56.8%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.6 SolMistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 72.7%48.2%GPT-5.6 Sol leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5.6 Sol and Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) today?

GPT-5.6 Sol: $5.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning): $0.15 input / $0.60 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.