Model comparison
GPT-5.6 Sol vs Kimi K2
Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.6 Sol #3 (Supported); Kimi K2 #189 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. GPT-5.6 Sol and Kimi K2 share 13 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 33 results are unique to GPT-5.6 Sol; 1 to Kimi K2.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 13
- GPT-5.6 Sol only
- 33
- Kimi K2 only
- 1
- Comparable categories
- 1 / 8
Pick GPT-5.6 Sol if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Kimi K2 only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
GPT-5.6 Sol is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 81.96 to 27.19. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.6 Sol's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 87.5 against 16.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4), 83.000% to 0.000%.
GPT-5.6 Sol is also the more expensive model on tokens at $5.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.60 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens for Kimi K2. That is roughly 12.0x on output cost alone. GPT-5.6 Sol is the reasoning model in the pair, while Kimi K2 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-5.6 Sol gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Kimi K2.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | GPT-5.6 Sol | Δ | Kimi K2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Math | GPT-5.6 Sol87.5 | Margin← 71.4 | Kimi K216.1 |
| Agentic | GPT-5.6 Sol92.0 | MarginNo overlap | Kimi K2Not measured |
| Coding | GPT-5.6 Sol64.6 | MarginNo overlap | Kimi K2Not measured |
| Knowledge | GPT-5.6 Sol94.6 | MarginNo overlap | Kimi K2Not measured |
| Multimodal | GPT-5.6 Sol83.0 | MarginNo overlap | Kimi K2Not measured |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)
MathA 83.000%B 0.000%Winner: GPT-5.6 SolΔ 83FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4): GPT-5.6 Sol scored 83.000%; Kimi K2 scored 0.000%. GPT-5.6 Sol wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)
MathA 89.000%B 21.404%Winner: GPT-5.6 SolΔ 67.6FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3): GPT-5.6 Sol scored 89.000%; Kimi K2 scored 21.404%. GPT-5.6 Sol wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol | Kimi K2 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | GPT-5.6 Sol$5 input / $30 output | Kimi K2$0.6 input / $2.5 output | Kimi K2 has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | GPT-5.6 SolNot available | Kimi K243 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | GPT-5.6 SolNot available | Kimi K21.51 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | GPT-5.6 Sol1M | Kimi K2128K | GPT-5.6 Sol lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic17 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Sol | Kimi K2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 91.9% | — | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | 92.2% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld 2.0Source | 62.6% | — | Not comparable |
| CyberGymSource | 84.5% | — | Not comparable |
| ExploitGymSource | 33.7% | — | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | 58% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 54.0% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 85.1% | 61.1% | GPT-5.6 Sol leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 61.8% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1736 | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 1501 | — | Not comparable |
| AA ITBenchSource | 56.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 33.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | 51.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | 87.2% | — | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | 65.9% | — | Not comparable |
| aaTerminalBench21Source | 88% | — | Not comparable |
Coding8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Sol | Kimi K2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench ProSource | 64.6% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 91.9% | — | Not comparable |
| deepSweSource | 72.7% | — | Not comparable |
| FrontierCode 1.1 ExtendedSource | 60.6% | — | Not comparable |
| cursorBench32Source | 67.2% | — | Not comparable |
| VulcanBench v3Source | 87.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 77.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 56.1% | 34.5% | GPT-5.6 Sol leads |
Reasoning4 benchmarks
Knowledge10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Sol | Kimi K2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 94.6% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | 94.6% | — | Not comparable |
| HealthBench ProfessionalSource | 60.5% | — | Not comparable |
| HealthBench HardSource | 33.1% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 58.9% | 19.4% | GPT-5.6 Sol leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 94.1% | 76.6% | GPT-5.6 Sol leads |
| AA-HLESource | 47.2% | 7.0% | GPT-5.6 Sol leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 21.7% | -27.5% | GPT-5.6 Sol leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 58.5% | 26.8% | GPT-5.6 Sol leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 88.8% | 74.2% | Kimi K2 leads |
MathGPT-5.6 Sol wins3 benchmarks
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Sol | Kimi K2 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 72.7% | 41.5% | GPT-5.6 Sol leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Which is better, GPT-5.6 Sol or Kimi K2?
GPT-5.6 Sol is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 81.96 to 27.19. The biggest single separator in this matchup is FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4), where the scores are 83.000% and 0.000%.
Which is better for math, GPT-5.6 Sol or Kimi K2?
GPT-5.6 Sol has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 87.5 versus 16.1. Inside this category, FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.