Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen3.6 Plus
Head-to-head evidence from 5 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.4 Pro #44 (Estimated); Qwen3.6 Plus #30 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.6 Plus share 5 comparable benchmark results. 5 of 8 categories are comparable. 7 results are unique to GPT-5.4 Pro; 55 to Qwen3.6 Plus.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 5
- GPT-5.4 Pro only
- 7
- Qwen3.6 Plus only
- 55
- Comparable categories
- 5 / 8
Pick Qwen3.6 Plus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 Pro only becomes the better choice if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 1.05M context window.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 5 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 5 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
Qwen3.6 Plus is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 65.2 to 60.89. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen3.6 Plus's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 60.5 against 46.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 58.7% to 28.8%. GPT-5.4 Pro does hit back in agentic, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
GPT-5.4 Pro gives you the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 1M for Qwen3.6 Plus.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | GPT-5.4 Pro | Δ | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | GPT-5.4 Pro89.3 | Margin← 27.7 | Qwen3.6 Plus61.6 |
| Reasoning | GPT-5.4 Pro83.3 | Margin← 21.3 | Qwen3.6 Plus62.0 |
| Multimodal | GPT-5.4 Pro94.0 | Margin← 14.2 | Qwen3.6 Plus79.8 |
| Math | GPT-5.4 Pro46.9 | Margin→ 13.6 | Qwen3.6 Plus60.5 |
| Knowledge | GPT-5.4 Pro58.7 | Margin← 1.6 | Qwen3.6 Plus57.1 |
| Coding | GPT-5.4 ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.6 Plus70.3 |
| Multilingual | GPT-5.4 ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.6 Plus84.7 |
| Inst. Following | GPT-5.4 ProNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Qwen3.6 Plus82.3 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
HLE
KnowledgeA 58.7%B 28.8%Winner: GPT-5.4 ProΔ 29.9HLE: GPT-5.4 Pro scored 58.7%; Qwen3.6 Plus scored 28.8%. GPT-5.4 Pro wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)
MathA 37.500%B 8.333%Winner: GPT-5.4 ProΔ 29.2FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4): GPT-5.4 Pro scored 37.500%; Qwen3.6 Plus scored 8.333%. GPT-5.4 Pro wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)
MathA 50.000%B 26.207%Winner: GPT-5.4 ProΔ 23.8FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3): GPT-5.4 Pro scored 50.000%; Qwen3.6 Plus scored 26.207%. GPT-5.4 Pro wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
MMMU-Pro
MultimodalA 94%B 78.8%Winner: GPT-5.4 ProΔ 15.2MMMU-Pro: GPT-5.4 Pro scored 94%; Qwen3.6 Plus scored 78.8%. GPT-5.4 Pro wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | GPT-5.4 Pro$30 input / $180 output | Qwen3.6 PlusNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | GPT-5.4 Pro74 tok/s | Qwen3.6 PlusNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | GPT-5.4 Pro151.79 s | Qwen3.6 PlusNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | GPT-5.4 Pro1.05M | Qwen3.6 Plus1M | GPT-5.4 Pro lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
AgenticGPT-5.4 Pro wins17 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrowseCompSource | 89.3% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 61.6% | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 58.8% | Not comparable |
| QwenClawBenchSource | — | 57.2% | Not comparable |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | — | 70.7% | Not comparable |
| VITA-BenchSource | — | 44.3% | Not comparable |
| DeepPlanningSource | — | 41.5% | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | — | 39.8% | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | — | 48.2% | Not comparable |
| MCP-TasksSource | — | 74.1% | Not comparable |
| WideResearchSource | — | 74.3% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 27.6% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 97.7% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 31.8% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1135 | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | — | 50.60% | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | — | 18.0% | Not comparable |
Coding7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 78.8% | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 56.6% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 73.8% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench v6Source | — | 87.1% | Not comparable |
| Vibe Code BenchSource | — | 25.56% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 54.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | — | 40.7% | Not comparable |
ReasoningGPT-5.4 Pro wins5 benchmarks
KnowledgeGPT-5.4 Pro wins15 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLESource | 58.7% | 28.8% | GPT-5.4 Pro leads |
| FrontierScienceSource | 36.7% | — | Not comparable |
| FrontierScience ResearchSource | 36.7% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | 42.7% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | — | 90.4% | Not comparable |
| SuperGPQASource | — | 71.6% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 88.5% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ReduxSource | — | 94.5% | Not comparable |
| C-EvalSource | — | 93.3% | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 39.6% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 88.2% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 25.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | 2.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 26.2% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 32.0% | Not comparable |
MathQwen3.6 Plus wins9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| IPhO 2025 (Theory)Source | 93.5% | — | Not comparable |
| FrontierMath (legacy)Source | 50% | — | Not comparable |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source | 50.000% | 26.207% | GPT-5.4 Pro leads |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source | 37.500% | 8.333% | GPT-5.4 Pro leads |
| AIME26Source | — | 95.3% | Not comparable |
| HMMT Feb 2025Source | — | 96.7% | Not comparable |
| HMMT Nov 2025Source | — | 94.6% | Not comparable |
| HMMT Feb 2026Source | — | 87.8% | Not comparable |
| MMAnswerBenchSource | — | 83.8% | Not comparable |
Multilingual2 benchmarks
MultimodalGPT-5.4 Pro wins9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU-ProSource | 94% | 78.8% | GPT-5.4 Pro leads |
| MMMUSource | — | 86.0% | Not comparable |
| MathVisionSource | — | 88.0% | Not comparable |
| VideoMMMUSource | — | 84.0% | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | — | 68.2% | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | — | 81.5% | Not comparable |
| V*Source | — | 96.9% | Not comparable |
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | — | 78.0% | Not comparable |
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | — | 1249 | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (6)
Which is better, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.6 Plus?
Qwen3.6 Plus is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 65.2 to 60.89. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 58.7% and 28.8%.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.6 Plus?
GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 58.7 versus 57.1. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for math, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.6 Plus?
Qwen3.6 Plus has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 60.5 versus 46.9. Inside this category, FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for reasoning, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.6 Plus?
GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 83.3 versus 62. Inside this category, CritPt is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.6 Plus?
GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 89.3 versus 61.6. Qwen3.6 Plus stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.6 Plus?
GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 94 versus 79.8. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.