Model comparison
GPT-5.4 Pro vs GPT-OSS 120B
Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.4 Pro #44 (Estimated); GPT-OSS 120B #116 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. GPT-5.4 Pro and GPT-OSS 120B share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to GPT-5.4 Pro; 25 to GPT-OSS 120B.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 1
- GPT-5.4 Pro only
- 11
- GPT-OSS 120B only
- 25
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for GPT-5.4 Pro and GPT-OSS 120B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
GPT-5.4 Pro is priced at $30.00 input / $180.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for GPT-OSS 120B. GPT-5.4 Pro has the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 128K for GPT-OSS 120B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | GPT-5.4 Pro | Δ | GPT-OSS 120B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | GPT-5.4 Pro89.3 | MarginNo overlap | GPT-OSS 120BNot measured |
| Reasoning | GPT-5.4 Pro83.3 | MarginNo overlap | GPT-OSS 120BNot measured |
| Knowledge | GPT-5.4 Pro58.7 | MarginNo overlap | GPT-OSS 120BNot measured |
| Math | GPT-5.4 Pro46.9 | MarginNo overlap | GPT-OSS 120BNot measured |
| Multimodal | GPT-5.4 Pro94.0 | MarginNo overlap | GPT-OSS 120BNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 Pro | GPT-OSS 120B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | GPT-5.4 Pro$30 input / $180 output | GPT-OSS 120B$0 input / $0 output | GPT-OSS 120B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | GPT-5.4 Pro74 tok/s | GPT-OSS 120B262 tok/s | GPT-OSS 120B has the higher measured throughput. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | GPT-5.4 Pro151.79 s | GPT-OSS 120B0.79 s | GPT-OSS 120B reaches the first token sooner. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | GPT-5.4 Pro1.05M | GPT-OSS 120B128K | GPT-5.4 Pro lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | GPT-OSS 120B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrowseCompSource | 89.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 13.2% | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | — | 3.1% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 65.8% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 15.0% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 799 | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | — | 29.61% | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | — | 25.5% | Not comparable |
| AA ITBenchSource | — | 5.6% | Not comparable |
Coding4 benchmarks
Reasoning3 benchmarks
Knowledge12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | GPT-OSS 120B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLESource | 58.7% | — | Not comparable |
| FrontierScienceSource | 36.7% | — | Not comparable |
| FrontierScience ResearchSource | 36.7% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | 42.7% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 23.8% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 78.2% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 18.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -50.0% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 21.5% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 91.2% | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | — | 38.9% | Not comparable |
| AA MMLU-ProSource | — | 80.8% | Not comparable |
Math5 benchmarks
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | GPT-OSS 120B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource | — | 82.8% | Not comparable |
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Pro | GPT-OSS 120B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 69.0% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare GPT-5.4 Pro and GPT-OSS 120B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for GPT-5.4 Pro and GPT-OSS 120B today?
GPT-5.4 Pro: $30.00 input / $180.00 output per 1M tokens GPT-OSS 120B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.